Att vs comcast internet

Disturbing the sound of silence

2015.06.03 02:53 Disturbing the sound of silence

Minions are a marketing ploy introduced in 2010. They are now the Facebook mascots of seventh graders, way2random girls, grandmothers, Donald Trump and obnoxious people.
[link]

2014.05.19 20:36 HeyImB0red Net Neutrality Association

This association supports Net Neutrality by informing it's members about legislation and efforts to take it away. We support the 1st Amendment and the way it pertains to the internet. We oppose any efforts to slow down, speed up or block websites, content, and companies.
[link]

2017.07.12 21:18 Jakudk Battle for the net

Comcast, Verizon and AT&T want to end net neutrality so they can charge extra fees to control what we see & do online. On July 12, we take the first step to stop them. This is a battle for the Internet's future. Before you do anything else, send a letter to the FCC & Congress now!
[link]

2023.06.02 10:48 sann540 (2/2)April 2023

17-Apr-2023
​
18-Apr-2023
​
19-Apr-2023
​
20-Apr-2023
​
21-Apr-2023
​
24-Apr-2023
​
25-Apr-2023
​
26-Apr-2023
​
27-Apr-2023
​
28-Apr-2023
submitted by sann540 to dailyainews [link] [comments]

2023.06.02 10:14 Delicious-Policy-837 Why Congress Party is Anti-Hindu and How I, as a Clueless NRI, became a supporter of Hindutva politics in India until India is completely ruled by Pro-Hindu politicians with Pro-Hindu Ideology

Brothers and sisters,
I grew up in the Indian diaspora as an NRI who didn't know too much about Indian politics or India's internal issues to begin with. I was never religious, I always thought of myself as a cultural Hindu. I thought that Hindus were mostly safe in India being a Hindu majority country with Hindu cultural values.
I thought that the Congress Party was a "normal" party. But when I read about the 2011 draft of the Communal Violence Bill and learned about the 2009 Right to Education Act's inapplicability to Christian minority schools (Pramati judgement), I quickly came to the conclusion that the Congress Party and Sonia/Rahul Gandhi are part of a Vatican/Catholic Church/Christian/Western conspiracy against Hindus and Hinduism. When Sonia Gandhi married Rajiv Gandhi, the Catholic Church saw this moment as its "Constantine" moment in India, when it could try to achieve its nefarious goals by controlling the Indian National Congress. Ever wonder why INC is aligned by Christian missionaries?
See the following article:
https://swarajyamag.com/politics/is-congress-anti-hindu
In particular, I have a deep hatred of Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi who are Catholic Christians. They are evil, completely anti-Hindu, and the brainchild of laws like Right to Education Act and the 2011 draft of the Communal Violence Bill. It is painfully obvious that they are Vatican agents who have a deep hatred of Hindus and of Indians. That is why I pray for Sonia and Rahul's downfall each and every day.
Communal Violence Bill - Do all Hindus know that the Congress Party tried to pass a Communal Violence Bill in 2011 that assumed that all Hindus were guilty as default, just by being born as Hindus, while Christians & Muslims could freely attack Hindus without any consequences? Did you know that this plan involved creating a so-called "National Communal Commission" with a "minority" (read Muslim/Christian) majority that could somehow control the Indian armed forces and the police forces to bully and terrorize Hindus? Luckily the BJP under Sushma Swaraj and Arun Jaitley, along with Narendra Modi, blocked Congress from passing this anti-Hindu law. BJP and RSS successfully killed this law and then won 2014 in a landslide. Luckily since 2013, the genocidal anti-Hindu Congress Party has been destroyed in the Rajya Sabha and so can never do something like this Communal Violence Bill (CVB) again. Also, India has massive internet penetration now in 2023 compared to back then in 2013 when Congress tried to pass CVB, so if the Italian scum who rule the Congress Party try to pass CVB again they will be exposed and there will be bloody retaliation against them. Variants of the Communal Violence Bill appear in different Congress manifestos under cleverly disguised names and descriptions, but the anti-Hindu intent of the Italian scum is the same. Harsh Mander, who wrote this evil anti-Hindu law with genocidal intent, is still running free instead of being hunted down and punished.
Right to Education Act - We all know how this law discriminates against Hindus running schools while leaving Christian "minority" institutions completely exempt from its horrible requirements like 25% quota, teacher salaries (that are extremely high for no reason), infra requirements like playgrounds etc. Hindus need linguistic minority status or Jain minority status just to escape RTE on their school. This law is so evil and no other country in the world has laws that discriminate against their majority community in education. How dare a RAPIST Catholic padre who is a filthy pedophile has more rights than a Hindu to run a school without government interference? This was the brainchild of Vatican agent and Catholic terrorist Sonia. People like @ realitycheckind on Twitter have been screaming about RTE since 2014.
Nowadays, wealthy Hindus get around RTE by running linguistic minority or Jain minority schools. In Maharashtra, for instance, the vast majority of Hindu schools owned by politicians or big businessmen switched to linguistic minority status (Hindi/Gujarati/Kannada/Sindhi/Marwadi/Punjabi/Malayalam) or to Jain/Buddhist minority status. For instance, you'll notice that Ambani school in Mumbai is a Gujarati linguistic minority institution, or that Lodha school school in Mumbai is Jain minority, or that Birla school is Marwadi linguistic minority, or that Walsingham school owned by the Mittal family is Hindi linguistic minority. If the top 1% can kill RTE in their schools, why should a mom-pop Hindu family running a school be forced to take in RTE quota freeloaders?
Given how hard it is to politically undo reservation-type laws, the solution to kill the Right to Education Act across the whole of India is to make all Hindu schools across India into Jain minority institutions on paper, throwing out the 25% RTE quota freeloaders who should be kicked out of non-minority private schools. Simply put, nobody has the right to "free" private school education, just because you are part of a particular caste (SC/ST) or community. RTE is also a tool to infiltrate Muslim kids into Hindu owned private schools to achieve the so-called "secularism" that leftists want. If you run a Jain minority institute for instance, you can avoid such "secularism" and "diversity" in your student body and can screen out certain types of students.
This law was so evil and was the reason why so many communities like the Lingayats etc want minority status. Because no other country in the world has laws that make it easier for "minorities" to run schools compared to the majority community. The Jains wanted minority status and got it from the Congress Party in 2014, solely to protect their private schools and colleges from the evil reservation laws that we have and the 93rd constitutional amendment. Nowadays, all wealthy Hindus/corporate India are running Jain minority schools and colleges in the private sector free from any type of caste based reservation. In the future, you will see a movement run by UC Hindus against reservation in private educational institutions. Pratap Bhanu Mehta (who is really a Jain) knew of the 93rd amendment back in 2005 and successfully got the Jain minority status from the Congress Party. I've seen really top-notch private schools that have linguistic/Jain minority status and are safe from RTE.
Despite this law there, RSS appointees like Priyank Kanoongoo (head of NCPCR - national child rights commission) continue to try to "enforce" RTE on hapless Hindu owned non-minority schools. I have no idea why RSS doesn't have a problem with RTE. If Mr. Modi himself wanted to end RTE, I could guarantee you that this whole "program" would have been shut down on Day 1.
Why should a Hindu school owner be forced to admit 25% "free" education, while a similar school run by a Christian does not have to do so? Is this secularism? If it isn't secular, why aren't Hindus coming on the roads, demanding RTE to be imposed on the schools that those Catholic rapists run?
The True Religion of All Top Congress Leaders (news-flash, Congress is Hindu hating group of individuals plotting against Hindu civilization). While Owaisi is a radical Islamist, people like Rahul Gandhi and Sonia Gandhi are the biggest threat to Hindus on our planet today.
Rahul Gandhi - Catholic Christian
Catholic Christian like his mother. Pretends to be a Hindu but hates Hindu culture and Hindu traditions. Is more of an Italian Catholic Christian who is more comfortable talking to Catholic padres in a Church. Is most at home in Kerala with a large Catholic population. Uses Muslims as a vote bank but is really aligned with radical Christian forces that are enemies of Hindu civilization. Ran away from a Hindu majority parliamentary constituency to go to a "secular" Wayanad where Abrahamics (Muslims + Christians) are over 60% of the population, knowing that Hindus would punish him electorally.
Sonia Gandhi - Italian Catholic Christian, whose real name is ANTONIO MAINO. How on Earth did the largest opposition party (Indian National Congress) get taken by an Italian Christian woman and a Vatican stooge?
Malikharjun Kharge - Buddhist Ambedkarite Dalit. Also has a hatred for Hindu Dharma, even when Hinduism and Buddhism are both Indian/Indic faiths in our civilization that are mutually compatible with each other. Hindus don't have any problem with Buddhism or Buddhists and even see Buddhism as an "improved" or "enlightened" version of Hinduism, yet the radical Ambedkarite ideology tries to instigate Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes from other Hindu castes when all Hindus across our country are equal and together. Hindus don't have a problem with anybody embracing Buddhism.
Manmohan Singh - Sikh who was the first non-Hindu Prime Minister of India. Under Mr. Manmohan Singh's tenure, the Congress Party tried to pass the Communal Violence Bill (2011 draft) which distinguished between "minorities" and Hindus in criminal law but was luckily blocked by the BJP who killed it. Now Sonia Gandhi could have chosen a Hindu in her Congress Party as the Prime Minister when Congress won in 2004 and 2009. But she deliberately chose a non-Hindu to implement her radical Hindu-hating agenda. A titular figurehead whose daughter was found working for George Soros and who has a Hindu hating agenda as well.
Others - Ambika Soni who is a Christian, Kapil Sibal who also seems to be a Christian and so forth.
It is painfully clear that Congress Party has an agenda against Hindus and Hinduism and that their national leaders are anti-Hindu. So, why does Congress still win in some state elections?
Himachal Pradesh - was very close in 2022. Also, the Congress Party in Himachal Pradesh seems to be led by people who are Hindus. Never saw Hinduphobia YET in Himachal by Himachal Congress.
Chhattisgarh - Suspect that there is a massive conversion of tribals to Christianity, particularly in forests. Would be very dangerous if Baghel wins a 2nd term.
Karnataka - BJP government in Karnataka was corrupt and had poor leaders, with massive anti-incumbency with a 36% vs 43% vote differential. Also, the Kharge factor was there and many Hindu Dalits who would have voted for BJP voted for Cong just because of Kharge's Ambedkarite credentials. If the Congress unit in Karnataka supports Christian missionaries or Muslim terrorist organizations like PFI, it's up to the BJP government at the center to act.
Rajasthan - anti-incumbency in 2018. BJP should win Rajasthan very easily in 2023.
I don't think BJP is favored to win Chhattisgarh but I don't want Congress to ever have more than 3 states (Himachal, Karnataka, Chhatisgarh) by the end of 2023.
____________________________________________________________________________
Congress, being a minoritarian party full of radical Muslim + Christian Abrahamic terrorists, should be reduced below 10% of seats in the Rajya Sabha (currently it's at 31/245 or 12.6%).
submitted by Delicious-Policy-837 to IndiaSpeaks [link] [comments]

2023.06.02 09:22 gistya The Secrets Behind the Class of the Daily Free Multitool Given by the Armorer

Intro

In this post I will discuss how you can utilize this NPC to improve your multitool hunting. Below, I divulge the never-before revealed secret that determines which class of multitool he gives you.

Who is the Armorer?

The Armorer is a hire-able Vy'keen NPC who you can hire to man a Weapons Terminal at one of your bases, including your freighter base.

How do you get a free multitool from the Armorer?

After you've completed a series of quests that he gives you, the Armorer will start offering you a free multitool, which he says that he has made "in your honor".

Daily Quest

The armorer's free multitool interaction is considered a "daily quest" in the game files.
This is one of several daily quests available in No Man's Sky from various NPCs. Each of the base NPCs goes into an endless loop of daily quests that they offer.
In the NMS save file, each quest has a "recurrence" time, after which the quest will reset. Inspecting the save file, you will find the recurrence time is a unix timestamp for the next occurrence of 3:00 AM GMT (8:00 PM PDT) after the last time the game was saved.
For example, if you open your save on Tuesday at 4:45 PM PDT on Jan 1, then the timestamp will be for 8:00 PM PDT the same day. If you open that save on Feb. 21 at 9:34 PM PDT, then the recurrence timestamp will be updated on all the daily quests to Feb. 22 at 8:00 PM PDT.
For certain daily quests, you can only do it once per day, such as the quest given by the exocraft NPC in your base (he sends you to an abandoned building).
However for the armorer's daily quest, the recurrence deadline is when the class of multitool he offers, changes. That is because the recurrence timestamp is also used as the seed value for the procedural generation of the class of tool given by the Armorer.

Example of a Guaranteed S-Class Date for the Armorer

I have discovered that certain recurrence timestamps/seed values will cause the Armorer to consistently give an S-class tool from most pools.
On Memorial Day 2023 (May 29), I noticed that no matter what system I flew to, I kept getting S-class tools from the Armorer aboard my freighter. Once or twice he offered an A-class, but almost everywhere it was an S. The next day, however, he went back to offering B-class. The day after that, C-class.
I have also seen him give S-class, A-class, B-class, etc. on different days in the past, but never knew what it was tied to. For a long time, I thought it was due to where he was, but it turns out, it's due to "when!"

Risk-Free Way to find a Guaranteed S-Class Date for the Armorer

Here is the risk-free way that I advise everyone to start using to find and spread the word whenever we discover a next S-class day for the armorer.
Simply visit the armorer at least once every day aboard your freighter whenever you warp into a system, and see if he's offering an S-class tool. If he is, please post about it on reddit either here or in nmscoordinateexchange. Since the date seems to be the same across all saves and players, that way everyone can know when it's happening and take advantage to get a free S-class multitool!

What NOT To Do

Please don't manipulate your console's date or timestamps within your save files unless you really know what you're doing.
Warning: manually changing your system date to sometime in the future does not seem to work for checking whether those dates will have a guaranteed S-class dates. Even if someone can figure out how to make it work, setting your system date forward and running NMS will cause it to update many unrelated timestamps in your save file using that future date. This can totally mess up your farms, refiners, settlement income, and other time-based aspects of the game, ask me how I know! So I highly advise against using manual date-setting to future dates for any reason.
If, despite this, someone really wants to know the steps to verify that I'm not bullshitting you, then read on.

For Advanced Players: Steps to Verify the Guaranteed S-Class Date Without Modding Save Files

After a lot of experimentation on PC using the NMS Save Editor, I discovered that you can temporarily (for up to 24 hours) make the Armorer almost always give an S-class by tricking the game into thinking that it's sometime after 8PM on May 28, 2023, and before 8PM on the following day, and ensuring the recurrence deadline for the daily quests is on 8PM PDT May 29, 2023. (I'm sure there are other dates that work too, just don't know what they are.)
A way to do this without hacking save files is as follows.
Disclaimer: do not open an existing save file while your console has the incorrect date. This can seriously screw up your save. Also, back up your No Man's Sky saves before trying this method, as I can't promise that it won't have an unintended consequence. To minimize the risk, only work with a fresh save if you're going to experiment with this. (Also, using an existing save you've opened recently won't work, because the game will only ever set the recurrence date can only be set to a time in the future once it has been exceeded.) The below steps are offered purely for experimental purposes by experienced and tech-savvy users who know how to make backups of saves and/or who are comfortable losing their save data if they screw up. Messing with dates can certainly impact save file syncing. You have been warned.
  1. Disable the internet on your computer or console and force-quit No Man's Sky if it's running.
  2. Set the date and time manually to 8:01 PM PDT (or equivalent in your timezone) on May 28, 2023. (The equivalent in GMT would be 3:01 AM on May 29, 2023.)
  3. Launch No Man's Sky and start a new save. (Creative Mode is fastest).
  4. Once you have a freighter with a Weapons Terminal in the base, recruit an Armorer to work there.
  5. Go through all the Armorer's quests until they start offering a free multitool.
  6. Warp to an inhabited star system that's not a pirate system.
  7. Talk to the armorer aboard your freighter. He will offer an S-class multitool. (In some rare cases, it will be A-class, but if you repeat step 6 many times, you will find that it's almost always an S-class.)
Note: for some reason, the armorer gives a C-class tool if you're in:

Steps to Verify the Guaranteed S-Class Date By Modding Save Files (PC only)

Disclaimer: I do not endorse cheating or manipulation of save files. The below steps are offered purely for experimental purposes by experienced and tech-savvy users who know how to make backups of saves and/or who are comfortable losing their save data if they screw up. Messing with dates can certainly impact Steam save file syncing. Modding your multitool to be an S-class is much safer. You have been warned.
Do steps 1. and 2. above, then do the below steps instead of the above steps:
  1. Back up all your saves.
  2. Using NMS Save Editor by goatfungus (available on Github), open the PC save file in NMS Save Editor. Be sure to use a save in which you have an armorer in your freighter base who is offering the free multitool.
  3. Export the save file to JSON.
  4. Open the exported save file using a text editor such as Microsoft VS Code.
  5. Search for the text, "DM_WEAPON" -- this takes you to the mission data for the "daily mission" (DM) for the free multitool ("weapon").
  6. Select the numbers after "Seed:". Press control-c to copy. This is your save's current "recurrence deadline" for the daily quests.
  7. Press control-H for search and replace.
  8. Click in the Find box, and press control-V to paste in the existing recurrence timestamp value.
  9. Click in the Replace box, and type in 1685415600 (8:00 PM, May 29, 2023, Memorial Day).
  10. Press alt-A to replace all occurrences of the prior recurrence time with 1685415600.
  11. Press control-S to save.
  12. Close out of your text editor and go back to the NMS Save Editor.
  13. Select "Import from JSON" and select the file you just modified in the text editor.
  14. Once it imports, then click "Save Changes" in NMS Save Editor.
  15. Each save slot in NMS has two saves associated with it, the Autosave and the Restore Point. Make sure you perform steps 15 and 16 on BOTH the Autosave and the Restore Point.
  16. Open No Man's Sky. Load the save you just modified.
  17. Warp to an inhabited star system that's not a pirate system.
  18. Talk to the armorer aboard your freighter. He will offer an S-class multitool. (In some rare cases, it will be A-class, but if you repeat step 6 many times, you will find that it's almost always an S-class.)
Obviously this is a lot of steps, and it's much simpler to just find whatever style of multitool you want, then use NMS Save Editor to modify it to be S-class, if you're OK with cheating. The above steps are just provided for people who want to further experiment and study the details of how the class of the armorer's multitool is determined.
Note: I did test this method on two different play-throughs on different systems, under different gamertags, but it's possible that the dates that work for me won't work for you. I'm not sure if there could be other factors.

What are Multitool 'Pools'?

While streaming on Twitch in May 2017, I discovered that restarting ones game on a certain planet X, then traveling to a different planet Y or space station, would cause the multitools available on that planet Y or space station to change to the ones that were available on the planet X on which you restarted your game. As well, the multitools available when first warping in or restarting in space, would carry over to any planet in the same system.
Having shared this on Twitch and on Discord, it wasn't long before this method spread and started being mentioned on Reddit. Later that year and in the following years, further refinements were made to this method. Eventually someone called these sets of multitool styles, "multitool pools", and the name stuck.
Note: while it's possible someone else independently discovered the same things I did, there's no evidence they did so before I streamed it and shared about it on Discord. So as far as I'm concerned, I'm the original discoverer of multitool pools.

How Multitool Class Relates to Multitool Pools

As others have found, a multitool has a "native" class of S, A, B, or C, and can only appear one class better or worse than its native class. For example, a tool that's natively B class can only appear as A, B, or C. A tool that's natively C class can only appear as B or C. A tool that's natively A class can only appear as S, A, or B.
Based on this you can use the Armorer to more quickly figure out what styles of tool are in a given pool. Using a base terminus at a temporary planetary base next to a wall box that gives one of the styles of tool in the current pool, warp to your freighter base and use the Armorer to check another. Since warping to the freighter from a planetary base takes just 5 seconds, this is much faster than traveling between different minor settlements. From the freighter you can also hit the space station in 5 seconds via terminus. Since traveling via terminus in the same system doesn't reset the current pool, this greatly speeds surveying.
submitted by gistya to NoMansSkyTheGame [link] [comments]

2023.06.02 09:17 Dangerous_Ask_6522 Fråga till alla Taxichaufförer

Jag förstår att kvaliteten på olika taxibilar varierar stort, man köper in modeller som blir gamla efter ett tag etc.
Min fråga är, vad är det som avgör om man som chaufför får en ny fräsch bil vs en gammal som sliten?
Har det att göra med hur länge man arbetat, eller kanske ens betyg på appar som ubebolt?
submitted by Dangerous_Ask_6522 to Asksweddit [link] [comments]

2023.06.02 09:09 AlpineGuy Overcomplicating Backup

I am a bit stuck trying to design my offsite backup. I believe I am making this way too complicated. Looking for a discussion about what's reasonable. Maybe I am missing something.
Main server: - mini PC - 2x 10TB external harddisks in a zfs mirror configuration - (consumer-grade hw, no ecc, I know and accept the risks and shame). - Server runs Docker services + all family laptops backup to it (Borg/Duplicati).
Now I would like to install an offsite backup at my parent's place. It needs to be silent - cannot use industrial class hardware, so probably another mini PC, raspberry, or similar.
Idea / minimum viable product: - Raspberry Pi 3b - One 10TB harddisk (or less, not everything needs an offsite backup) - ext3, no zfs, Raspberry would be overwhelmed - Debian/Ubuntu - ssh + Borg backup from my primary server + laptops to this one (for the laptops: secondary backup target, not just replicating the backup server-to-server, as is recommended)
Discussion / not sure: - Risk of ransomware/virus: if I use ssh and automation to backup to it, an infected machine could delete its own backup. - So maybe backup should be pull, not push. Borg can pull using sshfs. However the help page has lots of warnings (e.g. needing root over ssh to pull the backup). Also not good. - Alternatively, "append only" backup mode. However, this requires manual pruning so the disk does not run full after a while. A bit complicated to set up. - If the main server fails entirely (burns down, stolen, zfs corrupted), am I really fine with one single ext3 backup? Maybe use dual harddisks and zfs as well offsite? However, if I want zfs, I need a stronger machine. Then I am at above 500 Euros for this, which is a bit above the desired budget. - Alternatively, maybe use a NAS, maybe even one with two HDs, but I don't trust their closed-source operating systems. - Renting space at a provider like Hetzner? However, I don't want to rely on a cloud service. However my own security is probably not better than theirs. What if they lose my data? What if I lose my data? I shouldn't get into the rabbit hole of discussing cloud vs. onsite pros and cons... but how can I decide? Hetzner storage box would be EUR 150 to 300 per year, but I would have no work like with the secondary server. Also they have snapshots, so I could deal with the ransomware thing.
I feel a bit stuck and cannot decide. People of the internet, what do you think?
submitted by AlpineGuy to DataHoarder [link] [comments]

2023.06.02 07:12 defialpro Sonos completely f%#*^ my network

Sonos completely f%#*^ my network
I tried setting it up on my xfi gateway. It corrupted my gateway/router preventing me from even seeing the ssid. All I wanted to do was set up my system at my new house and now my WiFi only works IF I have the damn thing plugged in. As soon as I unplug the rj45 from the back of my router it completely stops advertising and loses internet. Comcast was so confused and doesn’t know what to do other than me exchange the damn thing at the store. I spent the last 3 hours of my night troubleshooting this damn thing. What the actual fuck
submitted by defialpro to sonos [link] [comments]

2023.06.02 05:39 jeep364 Is Kobo reliable? Looking to switch from a glitchy late gen Paperwhite.

I exclusively sideload with Calibre. I like E-ink, backlight, 'night time warm mode' and usb-c connection. I do not need audio connection, internet access, anything like that. I can manually adjust backlight but I see some models are automatic. I like ability to use 'collections' on Kindle, but would enjoy an even more advanced organizing system.
I previously had great luck with old non paperwhite kindles. New gen kindle PW - no buttons, I thought I would hate the tapping vs physical buttons but it doesn't bother me much.
My PW issue: Besides annoying collection issues, my new kindle (well over a year at this point) will randomly freeze. Sometimes you wait 5-10 seconds and it will advance pages (a million times because you clicked a bunch). Sometimes takes 30 seconds and trying to open all the menus, etc. Sometimes you restart (really just sleep mode) and it works. Other times it sleeps and stays frozen requiring a hard reset. No fixes out there. Very very frustrating.
  1. How reliable are Kobo devices? Looking for simple use with warm backlight. No freezing. I don't need lightning fast anything or any features.
  2. What are your recommended devices for a basic user with my requirements?
  3. Best place to purchase? Rakuten kobo or Amazon or walmart?
  4. Any suggested cases, etc.?
  5. Are the refurbished models pretty decent? Or should I expect battery to die quickly, etc.
Thanks!
submitted by jeep364 to kobo [link] [comments]

2023.06.02 04:56 Santaures5 Promotion/Plan Change Request

My family has been with Xfinity/Comcast for most of the last 25 years, with the exception of a few years due to various reasons.
We currently pay $52 for 75mbps upload and download. We were interested in the $25 for 200 Mbps, but the Xfinity rep I talked to said that is for new customers unfortunately.
They countered with Internet Essentials which is $29.95 for 100 Mbps (no equipment). Don't think I am eligible for that & I don't want that. I also am not interested in a phone plan combo deal.
Astound is offering $25 for 300 Mbps + equipment + 2 year price lock. Is there anyway to get a similar offer? My family would rather not switch and go through the hassle. Would a comparable deal be possible, I am underwhelmed with the current offers at hand and am leaning on switching to Astound.
Thank you for your time, it is much appreciated!
-JH
submitted by Santaures5 to Comcast_Xfinity [link] [comments]

2023.06.02 04:35 graay_ghost "Am I A 5 or a 9?" Masterpost

Something I’ve noticed is that like half the “type me” type threads on this board are people asking if they’re 5s or 9s. This isn’t really that surprising on a Reddit sub because both 5s and 9s tend to be introverted and withdrawn so being online semi-anonymously is seen as a “safe” form of socialization for both. The confusion is because online quizzes generally separate 9ness into “niceness” and 5ness into “smartness” and there are statistically more 9s than 5s, but superficial descriptions tend to make make 5s appealing. Also, the first result if you type in something like “enneagram 5 vs 9” into google is The Enneagram Institute’s “Misidentifying 5s and 9s” page which is remarkably bad and very patronizing towards nines (only linked for completeness’s sake — its very bad)
Anyway. Both 5s and 9s are considered part of the “withdrawn” triad, and both tend to be rather introverted and seen as withdrawn in a literal sense by others. Both tend to have problems getting things done. Unlike how shallow profiles seem, both can be intelligent and highly imaginative, and may have niche interests — but enneagram isn’t about that. It’s about core motivations and patterns and getting out of those patterns to improve and actually fulfill your needs.
Trying to look into enneagram structure may not be super helpful either. Like, “5 is a head/fear type and 9 is a body/angeautonomy type” isn’t super helpful when trying to type yourself. Because a 9 is unlikely to experience themselves as someone particularly connected to their body specifically, and aren’t going to feel angry or a strong desire for autonomy — because, as an attachment type, the self is suppressed for the purpose of attaching to others to an extent that hexad types do not. A 9 may be very introspective and have a lot of thoughts and therefore feel they must be a head type, and a 5s higher tolerance for conflict may look like anger or a desire for autonomy. So this isn’t super helpful either when it comes to self-analysis.
I could go into a lot about triads and motivations and such but I’m going to be reductive for a moment and say most of it boils down to this: 9s struggle with knowing what they are. 5s tend to know exactly what they are, for better or for worse, and don’t want anyone else to know.
This doesn’t mean 5s never mistype but it’s a big reason why this mistype tends to be way more 9s mistyping themselves as 5s rather than the other way around — the other way around tends to be more of an issue with understanding the system for 5s than anything about themselves.
Also neither of these tend to be conscious drives, at least not at first. It’s hard to know that you don’t know yourself if you, well, don’t know yourself, in the case of 9s. 5s, in my experience and evidenced in youtube comments, can get wildly defensive about the fact that they don’t let other people know them. If they don’t deny it outright, they might angrily reply “what’s wrong with that, anyway?!” Because losing that kind of fine-grain control to other people is like, existentially terrifying to a 5.
But that’s the thing — enneagram isn’t supposed to be one of those buzzfeed personality quizzes where you take it and feel good about your result. It’s supposed to be a pretty damn uncomfortable truth about yourself! If you’re trying to type yourself as a 5 because you’d like to think of yourself as being “smart at things” and be done with it rather than coping with your own fundamental difficulty in understanding and following your own desires and needs, you’re not doing it right — and also, you’re a 9, not a 5. If you’re more offended by the fact that your unwillingness to disclose yourself is actually cutting you off of a fundamental part of your humanity that you’ve been avoiding because you’re scared, you’re a 5, not a 9. I’m going to go ahead and guess that one of these is giving you a way more visceral reaction than the other. So try to listen to that.
But, just in case you want to go further, here are, IME, more major differences between 5s and 9s:
I understand this is mostly from the 5 side of things because I’m a 5. So, I’ll go ahead and add some other sources that might help you. While these are more helpful than the original 5 vs 9 I posted I do think a lot of them focus more on behaviors or traits than actual core motivations. This might be helpful for you because motivations can be hard to tease out and traits and behaviors can give you a foothold to figure out WHY you do this thing and not that, but ultimately it comes down to motivations, not specific behaviors or "vibes."
u/RafflesiaArnoldii wrote a 9 vs 5 post which is mostly a description of traits. I would recommend looking at her overview of common systemic mistypes as well
Jennifer Brave’s 5 vs 9 video I will admit I do not like MBTI but I appreciate that though she goes into MBTI she tries her best to separate it from enneagram because people often get them confused when they’re really for totally different things. This is the video where she, a 6, says she doesn’t really mistake 5s and 9s at all. I think to people who do not immediately dismiss introverts, 5s and 9s really do not seem much alike at all and are not easily confused.
Leslie Hershberger’s Lookalike Types: 5 and 9 with an interesting note on how she had a 9 panel and a 5 managed to get on there by mistake and he was obviously very different from everyone else — so, 5s DO occasionally mistype as 9s, but often everyone else can see right through it.
​
​
I understand I am being a bit presumptive in calling this a masterpost but I will add additional resources and maybe this thread can host some useful discussion. Hopefully I did not make any egregious mistakes. Phew.
submitted by graay_ghost to Enneagram [link] [comments]

2023.06.02 03:53 RedsModerator The Reds fell to the Red Sox by a score of 8-2 - Thu, Jun 01 @ 07:10 PM EDT

Reds @ Red Sox - Thu, Jun 01

Game Status: Final - Score: 8-2 Red Sox

Links & Info

Reds Batters AB R H RBI BB K LOB AVG OBP SLG
1 Newman - 3B 4 1 3 1 0 0 0 .291 .355 .394
2 McLain - SS 4 0 1 1 0 1 2 .354 .417 .523
3 India - 2B 4 0 0 0 0 2 3 .277 .363 .418
4 Steer - 1B 3 0 1 0 1 1 1 .289 .358 .500
5 Stephenson, T - DH 4 0 1 0 0 0 1 .246 .335 .344
6 Fairchild - RF 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 .241 .338 .379
a-Fraley - RF 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 .245 .333 .394
7 Senzel - LF 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 .267 .345 .400
8 Barrero - CF 4 0 0 0 0 2 3 .224 .305 .336
9 Casali - C 3 1 1 0 0 2 0 .164 .258 .182
Totals 32 2 7 2 3 11 13
Reds
a-Grounded out for Fairchild in the 6th.
BATTING: 2B: Casali (1, Sale); Newman 2 (7, Sale, Martin); Steer (15, Sale); Stephenson, T (11, Sale). TB: Casali 2; McLain; Newman 5; Steer 2; Stephenson, T 2. RBI: McLain (9); Newman (18). Runners left in scoring position, 2 out: Barrero 2; India. GIDP: India. Team RISP: 3-for-8. Team LOB: 6.
Red Sox Batters AB R H RBI BB K LOB AVG OBP SLG
1 Verdugo - RF 4 1 0 0 1 1 1 .288 .365 .447
2 Devers - 3B 3 1 2 1 1 1 0 .252 .296 .510
3 Turner, J - DH 4 0 2 1 0 2 1 .267 .353 .406
1-Tapia, R - DH 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 .274 .337 .381
4 Yoshida - LF 3 1 0 0 1 0 4 .312 .389 .500
5 Duran, Ja - CF 2 1 0 0 2 1 2 .288 .344 .460
6 Hernández, K - SS 4 2 2 3 0 1 3 .239 .312 .372
7 Casas - 1B 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 .188 .301 .349
8 Wong - C 4 1 1 2 0 1 0 .244 .291 .487
9 Valdez, E - 2B 4 0 1 0 0 1 0 .250 .300 .440
Totals 32 8 8 7 5 8 15
Red Sox
1-Ran for Turner, J in the 8th.
BATTING: 2B: Devers 2 (15, Greene, H, Herget). HR: Hernández, K (5, 7th inning off Gibaut, 0 on, 0 out); Wong (6, 8th inning off Herget, 1 on, 2 out). TB: Devers 4; Hernández, K 5; Turner, J 2; Valdez, E; Wong 4. RBI: Devers (48); Hernández, K 3 (23); Turner, J (22); Wong 2 (15). 2-out RBI: Wong 2. Runners left in scoring position, 2 out: Casas. Team RISP: 4-for-7. Team LOB: 5.
FIELDING: Outfield assists: Verdugo (Steer at home). DP: 2 (Verdugo-Wong; Devers-Valdez, E-Casas).
Reds Pitchers IP H R ER BB K HR P-S ERA
Greene, H 6.0 2 1 1 3 8 0 109-67 3.92
Gibaut 1.0 1 1 1 0 0 1 8-7 3.76
Herget (L, 1-2) 1.0 5 6 6 2 0 1 29-19 5.30
Totals 8.0 8 8 8 5 8 2
Red Sox Pitchers IP H R ER BB K HR P-S ERA
Sale 3.2 5 1 1 1 6 0 59-40 4.58
Garza 1.1 0 0 0 0 1 0 19-12 1.17
Winckowski 1.0 0 0 0 1 1 0 16-9 2.08
Pivetta 1.0 0 0 0 0 3 0 15-10 5.54
Martin (W, 1-1)(BS, 1) 1.0 2 1 1 0 0 0 17-13 1.72
Jansen 1.0 0 0 0 1 0 0 13-6 3.24
Totals 9.0 7 2 2 3 11 0
Game Info
WP: Martin.
Balk: Herget.
IBB: Duran, Ja (by Herget).
Pitches-strikes: Greene, H 109-67; Gibaut 8-7; Herget 29-19; Sale 59-40; Garza 19-12; Winckowski 16-9; Pivetta 15-10; Martin 17-13; Jansen 13-6.
Groundouts-flyouts: Greene, H 1-8; Gibaut 1-1; Herget 3-0; Sale 1-2; Garza 1-0; Winckowski 1-1; Pivetta 0-0; Martin 1-1; Jansen 1-1.
Batters faced: Greene, H 23; Gibaut 4; Herget 10; Sale 16; Garza 4; Winckowski 4; Pivetta 3; Martin 4; Jansen 4.
Inherited runners-scored: Garza 2-0.
Umpires: HP: Jim Wolf. 1B: Mike Muchlinski. 2B: Sean Barber. 3B: Alan Porter.
Weather: 85 degrees, Clear.
Wind: 4 mph, Out To LF.
First pitch: 7:12 PM.
T: 2:38.
Att: 31,204.
Venue: Fenway Park.
June 1, 2023
Inning Scoring Play Score
Top 3 Kevin Newman doubles (6) on a fly ball to center fielder Jarren Duran. Curt Casali scores. 1-0 CIN
Bottom 4 Justin Turner singles on a ground ball to right fielder Stuart Fairchild, deflected by first baseman Spencer Steer. Rafael Devers scores. 1-1
Bottom 7 Enrique Hernandez homers (5) on a line drive to left center field. 2-1 BOS
Top 8 Matt McLain singles on a ground ball to center fielder Jarren Duran. Kevin Newman scores. 2-2
Bottom 8 Rafael Devers doubles (15) on a sharp fly ball to center fielder Jose Barrero. Alex Verdugo scores. 3-2 BOS
Bottom 8 Enrique Hernandez singles on a ground ball to right fielder Jake Fraley. Masataka Yoshida scores. Jarren Duran scores. 6-2 BOS
Bottom 8 Connor Wong homers (6) on a line drive to left center field. Enrique Hernandez scores. 8-2 BOS
Team Highlight
BOS Bullpen availability for Boston, June 1 vs Reds (00:00:07)
CIN Bullpen availability for Cincinnati, June 1 vs Red Sox (00:00:07)
CIN Fielding alignment for Cincinnati, June 1 vs Red Sox (00:00:11)
BOS Fielding alignment for Boston, June 1 vs Reds (00:00:11)
BOS Starting lineups for Reds at Red Sox - June 1, 2023 (00:00:09)
BOS Connor Wong's home run through bat tracking data (00:00:09)
CIN Kevin Newman's RBI double (00:00:17)
BOS Alex Verdugo nabs Steer at home (00:01:29)
BOS Justin Turner's RBI single (00:00:21)
BOS Rafael Devers' unusual double (00:00:40)
BOS Chris Sale strikes out six (00:01:03)
BOS Chris Sale exits with an injury (00:01:16)
BOS Kiké Hernández's go-ahead HR (5) (00:00:31)
CIN Matt McLain's game-tying single (00:00:16)
BOS Rafael Devers' go-ahead double (00:00:27)
BOS Kiké Hernández's two-run single (00:00:32)
BOS Raimel Tapia scores on a balk (00:00:26)
BOS Connor Wong's two-run homer (6) (00:00:45)
BOS Fan catches Alex Verdugo's bat (00:00:16)
BOS Kenley Jansen secures the win (00:00:59)
BOS The Red Sox score six in the 8th (00:02:11)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 R H E LOB
Reds 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 7 0 6
Red Sox 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 6 8 8 0 5

Decisions

Division Scoreboard

MIL 1 @ TOR 3 - Final
Next Reds Game: Fri, Jun 02, 05:10 PM EDT vs. Brewers
Last Updated: 06/01/2023 10:28:54 PM EDT
submitted by RedsModerator to Reds [link] [comments]

2023.06.02 02:40 AutoModerator [Get] Rich+Niche – Full Stack Marketing Funnels Download

[Get] Rich+Niche – Full Stack Marketing Funnels Download
Download : https://courseshere.com/download/get-richniche-full-stack-marketing-funnels-download/
https://preview.redd.it/pyfb5z5fld3b1.png?width=768&format=png&auto=webp&s=db6d20ed8e9b9a84a1c59c798b584dded768fd8b

Digital Marketing Theory

  • Classical Marketing Theory
  • The 4 P’s of Marketing
  • Internet Branding
  • Minimally Viable Products
  • Digital Marketing 101

Designing Funnels

  • Funnel Design Theory
  • Funnel Design Process
  • Project Discovery
  • Muse Design
  • Escape & Arrival
  • User Experience (UX)
  • 8-Step Customer Journey
  • Marketing Funnel System Design
  • Funnel Visualization

Building a Website

  • Buying Domains
  • DNS Settings
  • Web Hosting 101
  • Installing a WordPress Site
  • Installing a WordPress Theme
  • Best WordPress Plugins

Lead Magnets

  • What is a lead magnet?
  • 8 Keys to a Perfect lead Magnet
  • Pain Killers vs Vitamins
  • Escape & Arrival
  • Before and After Copywriting
  • The Best Friend Method
  • Making Lead Magnets in Canva
  • Lead Magnet Delivery

Copywriting That Works

  • Writing for Reptiles
  • Squeeze Page Copy
  • How to Write Headlines
  • Benefits Not Features
  • The Call-To-Action

Creating Landing Pages

  • How to set the squeeze page
  • Simple Mobile Friendly Layouts
  • Easy Image Mockups
  • How to Embed Forms

Email Marketing

  • Using a tool like Mailchimp
  • Audience and Lists
  • Your First Automated Email
  • Embedding Forms
  • Thank You Page Redirections
  • How to Test the System
  • Multi Email Automation

Google Analytics

  • Google Analytics Walkthrough
  • How to Gain Data-Driven Insights
  • Setting up Conversion Goals

Conversion Rate Optimization

  • Funnel Science
  • How to Optimize for Optins
  • How to Optimize for Email Open
  • How to Optimize for Email Clicks
  • How to Optimize for Purchases
  • CRO Exercises
  • Sales Page Development SOP

Online Traffic Sources

  • Organic Search Traffic (SEO)
  • Paid Traffic
  • Referral Traffic
  • Direct Traffic
  • Social Traffic
  • Traffic Strategy 101
submitted by AutoModerator to imcourselvn [link] [comments]

2023.06.02 02:12 Disappointing_Search Did you ever get a copyright notice?

The only time I got copyright notices was when the companies complained to my internet provider in 2017, those companies being Capcom and Bethesda due to the games being 2-3 months still new. If I remember right it was Evil Within 2 (meh game, first one was way better) and Marvel VS Capcom Infinite (which I made a post here about, it's 100% a cash grab game they should have thanked me for playing it). This is why when Empress drops new games I suggest for those who don't have a VPN anymore like me just use file drop sites (though it takes hours, probably slower than torrent).
If you wanna know the ending of course I deleted them when they asked because I just didn't want problems since I was still in High School. Not like the games were great to play, pretty disappointing.
View Poll
submitted by Disappointing_Search to PiratedGames [link] [comments]

2023.06.02 01:41 PikaGoesMeepMeep Tarptent zipper issues - Photo showing the fix

TL;DR: Fixed a common tarptent zipper issue, enjoy the before/after zipper photo I took!
​
I'm writing this partially because I was hoping to find someone's experience on the internet before I tried fixing my tent zipper. So here's my experience for anyone else who has the same issue:
My old tarptent had an aging zipper that was no longer doing its job. The zipper teeth would come apart after closing them. This is apparently a pretty common problem with tarptent zippers, since they use the smallest, most lightweight #3 zippers.
Their website gives instruction on "crimping" the slider to make it function again. i did this probably half a dozen times with some success before that stopped working. This way I was able to get another couple of years of function out of that zipper. Then, last year nothing I did would help any longer, and the zipper became practically non-functional.
Fearing I would need to replace the entire zipper (on the pricey side, tarptent does it for about $50 if you mail your tent in), I decided to try replacing just the metal zipper sliders, which tarptent sells for very cheap (cost me just over $2 with shipping).
Well, that was a roaring success and not difficult at all. My zipper now slides and opens and closes like new and I don't need to replace the whole thing after all, yay! While I had both old and new zipper sliders in hand, I took the opportunity to take an old/new comparison photo for your enjoyment. No wonder the old slider no longer worked, wow!
Zipper Old vs New
(Imgur seems to think this photo has erotic content. It doesn't, lol)
submitted by PikaGoesMeepMeep to Ultralight [link] [comments]

2023.06.02 00:53 wakigatameth Is Earthlink (user of AT&T lines) safer than Comcast in regard to DMCA?

I need to hook up Internet in my new apartment, and the only choices available are 800/800 Comcast fiber or Earthlink 75/8 mbps.
I can live with 75/8 mbps, if Earthlink is as good as Sonic about ignoring DMCA notices. Couldn't find anything on Google about their DMCA serving status. Any personal experiences?
submitted by wakigatameth to Piracy [link] [comments]

2023.06.02 00:15 Qingque-at-work- Math behind defense shred, how much damage SW and DefShred gear can add vs a harmony

(Hi QQmains. I did some serious digging to see if its worth it to pull for SW for an eventual mono quantum team. There was so little info out there that I actually think it will be worthwhile to post in the main sub too, so feel free to point out any errors you see so I can clean it up before posting there. I feel like Qingque should especially enjoy having a debuffer since she gives herself so many buffs already, so thats why I really dug into SW, plus being quantum makes SW a nice forever compaion for QQ. So enjoy and feel free to give feedback. I'm sure my formatting will end up terrible).
​
So with silver wolf banner coming up, I wanted to see how worthwhile she is for actually boosting damage. Obviously silver wolf is invaluable in difficult fights if it means the difference between being able to break enemies or not being able to break them (high MoC relies heavily on breaking to stop enemy super attacks).
But the elephant in the room is: you could just bring a team that is the right element to break. If so, is SW worthless? Is SW still on par with or better than another buffer or debuffer support that you could bring if we ignore her adding a weakness and 20% elemental resist shred? I decided to find out through the power of math!
Here's a quick table of contents if you want to see something specific: 1. Defense Shred, the one stat with exponential scaling 2. A quick rundown on defense shred options 3. Comparing SW to her competition 4. Quantum set for non-quantum hypercarries?!?! 5. The TL;DR to boost your damage through the roof.
​
  1. Defense Shred, the one stat with exponential scaling
As I'm sure you have heard, stats have diminishing returns. Actually that is complicated enough it will get a whole dedicated post from me about it, but needless to say, the TL;DR is that you want to spread your stats around, and not go too far into one stat bucket. Since everyone gets attack, damage, and crit from light cones, traces, and relics, defense shred is a nice all around multiplier. But interestingly enough, the closer you get to 100% defense shred, the better each point of defense shred gets!
If you look at the Defense Shred Calculations image, you can see that in a normal endgame scenario, we are level 80 vs a level 90 enemy, and all of our damage is reduced by 53%. All your hard work, half of it just disappears. And all enemies, from bosses to weaklings, have this at level 90 (except warp trotters which are even tankier!).
The first 10% defense shred you get increases your overall damage by 5.3%, but each 10% after that gives more and more, until the final 10% of defense shred (going to a full 100% defense shred), gives a 21% overall damage boost. This means a little defense shred isn't great, you need to stack it! Interestingly, if we are allowed to blow past 100% defense shred, things get a little crazy. So crazy that I have to assume that defense shred will be capped at 100%. But resist shred can go past 100% (and with no penalty like in genshin), so we will have to see once SW is out and we have enough defense shred in the game to acually go past 100%. A full 100% defense shred gives a whopping 110% overall damage boost! But how feasable is that?
​
  1. Here are out limited defense shred options: - Pela ultimate, ~40% defense shred - Pela technique, 20% defense shred (For 2 turns only, will only be helpful ultra lategame when we 2 turn Moc...does it reapply each wave like welts technique does?) -Resolution Shines Like Pearls of Sweat, the Light Novel Title of light cones, gives 12-16% defense shred. As a standard 4 star light cone, we will all end up with S5 in a year or so, most likely. -Silver Wolf, ???% defense shred, we only know CBT values, so I will just assume 54% overall defense shred to get a nice even number with S5 RSLPOS light cone. -Quantum relic 4 piece set, gives 10-20% defense ignore. This stacks additively just like defense shred, the only difference is that it only works on whoever is wearing it, unlike defense shred. Fun fact on the fine print of the set bonus: the 10% defense ignore is unconditional. And the 20% defense ignore is on quantum weak enemies, NOT on quantum outgoing damage. So your ice or electric or fire units can get the full 20%. If only there was some character who could make all enemies weak to quantum...
So currently, with Pela trace lvl 12, and her technique, and RSLPOS S5, and a carry holding the quantum set against a quantum weak enemy, we have 98% defense shred. But only for 2 turns. SW can get up to 90% by herself, actually less than pela and only on a single target! But with no 2 turn restriction. Also, SW has a 13% resist shred to whatever element her skill activates, and that is on top of the 20% resist shred that comes with adding a weakness (and I'm not calculating that 20% here since I want to look at worst case for SW).
OK, so we know that defense shred adds a ton of damage (roughly double), but there is an opportunity cost! SW, or pela for that matter, will be replacing a buffing unit most likely. So, lets look into how much a harmony unit increases your hypercarrys damage, vs our defense and resist shred units.
​
  1. Comparing SW to her competition
In my image "damage increase of buffers and debuffers", I have to make quite a few assumptions. For damage, I use the formula of attack*dmg*critdmg*def*resist*vuln*toughness. I looked at what different e0 5 star hypercarries can look like with all their traces, solid (not perfect) gear, buffed states activated, and good light cones (multiple superimposition 4 stars, or FTP 5 stars). Obviously every character has slightly different stats, and will have different gear. But I averaged things out to having a 200% increase in attack (slightly less than 200% att%, plus the flat attack), 200% in all DMG bonuses, 100% net crit damage [you won't crit every time but you can average out what the damage will be when accounting for crit %, and this is a somewhat balanced and reasonable value, obviouly yanqing will be higher]. Then I assumed no defense or resist shred (seele is an outlier there), and no vulnerability (welt trace), and no toughness bar modifies (you lost 10% damage if they aren't broken). But stats like vulnerability and toughness modifier are irrelevant to this since their values will be the same regardless of which units are picked, I only put them in to show I wasn't forgetting about them. My one small number fudge was I didnt subtrace out the flat damage value before adding the attack mulitpliers of the harmony units (since I don't have an exact number, I'm using a 200% green number compared to your base attack), so me adding the harmony attack% to the full number and not 80% of it actually makes the harmony units look a tiny bit stronger than they actually should. The big missing info that I can't easily calculate here: how much value is speed from asta, extra turn from bronya, or extra energy from tingyun? On the flip side, how much value is the slow from silver wolf, the break from silver wolf and pela and asta, or the damage increase that other teammates get from the AOE buffs/debuffs vs. the single target of some skills like tingyun ult. These are all addittional factors that you have to keep in mind when looking at this chart, the numbers do NOT give an easy "this unit is 10% better than this unit no matter what", it can only look at the dimension of damage of a hit. You need full sims for that, and I haven't seen any for teams and gear like I'm doing here, so this will have to do for now. And keep in mind, this is assuming that the enemy is already weak (and this 0% reduction from resistance), so SW is being considered only in her worst case scenario (but I do give the 13% resist shred, so it assumes she occasionally uses her skill). ALSO, this assumes 100% uptime on everything, when in reality it is much easier to keep a 2 turn debuff active than a 1 or 2 turn buff (seele turns go brrr), especially if you have bronya blasting through your carrys turns.
If you took a look, you will see that, unsurprisingly, in a lightly geared situation, bronya sits supreme without even accounting for her turn acceleration. But when you really start to stack up the best light cones and situations, Pela and SW really start to pull their own weight. The difference between a plain pela ultimate and a defense shred stacking pela team is HUGE, and something I wish was more widely explained (rather than the usual "I think pela is underrated but I'm not sure how". The extra defense shred over SW even beats out the 13% resist shred boost that SW can bring.
The last 2 lines are really the big news that blew me away. I figured that most lategame teams will have 2 support slots, and only 1 dedicated tank/healer, since we won't be 20 levels under and will have max gear. And looking at the damage multiplier values, a single hypercarry getting a huge boost will be better than 2 carries getting a small boost (and fighting for skill points). So we see that stacking harmony units really has diminishing returns, since they keep adding to the same buckets, mostly attack and damage (and for my example I used bronyas signature so that damage boost could stack, in reality dance dance dance would be run on one of them). So combining 2 harmony units isn't a huge force multiplier, especially if they both also focus on speed (which also has diminishing returns, though not calculated here). Also, I didn't even consider stacking debuffers together, since each alone could almost get 100% defense shred, running both would be a complete waste. But mixing SW and bronya, we see HUGE results. pela and tingyun together also show a similar increase. Since the harmony and nihility hit different buckets, they really multiply off of each other, way more than 2 harmony units do.
  1. Quantum 4 piece set: So IF looking at the info above, you decide to run a nihility unit, the quantum 4 piece set is probably BiS for your hypercarry. If you are running SW, it is a 15% overall damage increase (OVERALL!) on non quantum weak enemies, and over 30% on quantum weak enemies. And as we know, if you are running mono ice, you might get unlucky and implant quantum, or they might already be quantum weak. And that is a solid bonus effect. No current set is anywhere close to 30% overall damage increase, miles away from it.
  2. TL;DR
I think with this information, going forward I personally will use one harmony and one nihility unit as my 2 hypercarry supports, instead of 2 harmony units. I will definitly try to have one harmony unit that boosts speed though (either by the speed stat or by letting you use your damaging ultimate faster).
For the nihility unit, you really want to use Resolution light cone, it really even crushes stuff like unique multipliers (vulnerability), or break effect (since that can be gotten on gear). And I will start farming the quantum set for my carries, as that even further boosts what the resolution cone gives on defense shred.
Pela vs. Silver Wolf is still a huge question mark. If teams need SW to add a weakness, she is invaluable. But if the enemy is already weak, Pela perfoms close enough (and better for 2 turns) making the SW pull questionable, well unless you need both for 2 different teams! In my opinion, SW will be excellent for mono quantum teams, and still completely solid if you want to run a triple element team, as she still is a huge force multiplier when combined with a strong harmony unit.
Thank you for reading, and I hope all this information can help the meta pullers out there decide if SW is worth it or not. And that it will get all you Pela havers to start gearing her up!
submitted by Qingque-at-work- to Qingquemains [link] [comments]

2023.06.01 23:41 TimeJustHappens Updates to Wording and Clarity of Subreddit Rules

Hi everyone!

We are here to notify everyone that the rules for /VALORANT have received updates to their wording/clarity. We have been collecting user feedback on wording confusions and have been monitoring removed submissions to pinpoint the most commonly broken rules due to misunderstandings. Rule ambiguity causes confusion for users and additional workload for the moderation team.
No rules have had their core purpose changed. Some rules have had clarifying statements or additional phrasing added to expand on specific examples. This announcement is a transparency breakdown and not a policy change.
If you have questions/comments about the clarifications or would like to offer any points of confusion, we will be sticking around for this announcement's one week duration to try and answer comments. You can also speak to us directly/privately through subreddit modmail. Our general Moderation Statement can be found in the subreddit resources section of our wiki.

Summary of Changes

[All Rules]

  • Revised spelling/grammar issues
  • Shortened wording when appropriate

[Personal Attacks]

  • Removed "primary intention" since personal attacks are not permitted regardless of whether they were the primary intention
  • Replaced "victim of this rule" with "victim of a personal attack" since the rule is not what is attacking the user

[Self-Promotion]

  • Changed wording to be more clear that the ratio considers the past 25 submissions, not 22 submissions
  • Added wording to make it more clear that this is across all of Reddit and not just a consideration for the subreddit (concurrent with Reddit site-wide rule suggestions on spam and self promotion)
  • Added the statement "Directly asking for promotional engagement (such as likes, subscribers, views, etc.) is not permitted." to reflect extension of self promotional begging

[Stream and Channel Links]

  • Moved rule to section 2 "Spam" due to its close relation to Self-Promotion

[Reposted Topics]

  • Revised "Frequently asked questions and topics will be removed" to "Routinely asked questions and topics with static answers may be removed" to better reflect how we evaluate common topics
  • Changed "Posts will no longer..." to "Topics will no longer..." to reduce confusion about what is being compared as a repost (i.e., the original post is not the repost, its the topic)
  • Changed "toxicity" to "breaching Riot ToS" in generalized complaints to better encompass the extent of topics like generalized cheater complaint posts

[Irrelevant Topics]

  • Added "Articles, surveys, studies, and other generalized gaming content must specifically focus on VALORANT" to reflect a clarification on surveys and studies commonly asked by users
  • Added "Content with the primary focus on real-life issues or complications which are not specifically related to VALORANT may be removed" to reflect community feedback on IRL issue posts

[Low-effort Submissions]

  • Restructured slightly to make line about memes and short jokes be one of the bullet points
  • Added "and polls" after "short jokes"
  • Added "or specific question" to gameplay help exception to better reflect the removal reason wording
  • Added "Short cosmetic purchasing/comparison polls which are highly subjective (posts giving breakdowns of skin effects comparisons, art evaluations, and other meaningful discussions are permitted)" to reflect quality clarification on low-effort skin purchasing polls
  • Added "AI generated content that does not contain significant/meaningful involvement or effort from the author, such as short prompts, lack of additional content creation or context, and generalized topics made only for the purpose of showing that the content is "AI generated"" to detail new stance on AI content and its quality threshold

[Vague Titles]

  • Made the rule of thumb statement its own sentence instead of a bullet example
  • Added "misleading" to the list of disallowed title qualities

[English Only]

  • Added short disclaimer explaining that we are unable to properly moderate all languages

[Rants]

  • Moved Rants to section 3 "Quality" to better reflect what it is about (similar to low-effort)
  • Changed "player's general visible rank" to "player's general visible rank and MMR" to be more thorough regarding the semantics of rank vs. MMR
  • Replaced "AFKs, toxicity" with "players breaking Riot Games Terms of Service" to more accurately label the category

Changed Section 4 "Video Restrictions" to "Post Format Restrictions"

[Directly Linked and Uploaded Clips]

  • Changed name to "Gameplay Video Content" to better reflect that the rule is not just about clips and omit the "directly linked" that users often get confused about
  • Changed wording "to be directly linked and uploaded" to "to be submitted as a video or link submission"
  • Removed timezone conversion examples and instead put a disclaimer to use a converter website due to user confusion during time zone shifts, daylight savings, etc.
  • Revised list of examples of allowed/disallowed content to be more general and follow the format of defining Esports and Educational content

[Short Duration]

  • Moved the 15s video minimum rule as a bullet point in the list instead of a separate sectioned statement to reduce separation and confusion
  • Condensed statement of exemption for Esports content because it is defined later to "VALORANT Esports content is exempt from the Short Duration guidelines and may be submitted as images and videos under 15s."

[NSFW]

  • Added disclaimer "Sexualized or harassing comments towards users are not tolerated"

[Soliciting, Peddling, Riot's Terms of Services]

  • Revised statement about Riot ToS to "Content that breaks Riot's Terms of Service (boosting threads, advertisement of cheats/hacks, account selling/buying, etc). are strictly prohibited and may be met with an immediate permanent ban." to reflect our protocol exception of a permanent ban on first offense
  • Shortened "falls under soliciting/peddling/Riot ToS" to "this rule"

[Direct Address]

  • Changed example "Riot, you need to" to "To the developers" because there was already a similar example of "Riot please"

[Private Individuals]

  • Added "linking to a players profile or website" to methods of exposing a private individual to encompass things like linking to a person's Tracker.GG page
  • Removed "visible or non-visible names" and added separate statement of "Censoring names and identifying content does not permit bypass of this rule" to enforce clarity on specifics of rule
  • Changed "content creation or media presence" to "media presence or consented content creation" to clarify that another person making content of the non-consenting person does not qualify as a public individual

[Technical and Account Support]

  • Changed "As a community, we do not possess the ability to assist with technical support or account support issues" to "/VALORANT is not a dedicated community for technical or account support" due to user feedback that the phrasing was objectively wrong regardless of the intent of the statement

[Spoilers]

  • Added a new section which clarifies that while game related leaks are permitted, the sourcing of leaks is not (such as asking for help in leaking a document, crowdsourcing a leak effort, etc.).

[Claims Require Evidence]

  • Added "In game leaks must provide sufficient legitimacy and evidence" to the list to reflect stance on source-less leaks

[Flairs and Tags]

  • Reordered list to be in the same order as users see the flair list for intuitive clarity
  • Removed redundant definitions covered below by new definitions

[Reddit Rules]

  • Added a statement to review the Reddiquette page to reflect site-wide rules surrounding things like all caps titles, spam emojis, upvote/downvote manipulation comments, and more

Added a new "Definitions" section that includes VALORANT Esports, Educational, and Gameplay

submitted by TimeJustHappens to VALORANT [link] [comments]

2023.06.01 23:10 RedsModerator Game Thread: Reds @ Red Sox - Thu, Jun 01 @ 07:10 PM EDT

Reds @ Red Sox - Thu, Jun 01

Game Status: Final - Score: 8-2 Red Sox

Links & Info

Reds Batters AB R H RBI BB K LOB AVG OBP SLG
1 Newman - 3B 4 1 3 1 0 0 0 .291 .355 .394
2 McLain - SS 4 0 1 1 0 1 2 .354 .417 .523
3 India - 2B 4 0 0 0 0 2 3 .277 .363 .418
4 Steer - 1B 3 0 1 0 1 1 1 .289 .358 .500
5 Stephenson, T - DH 4 0 1 0 0 0 1 .246 .335 .344
6 Fairchild - RF 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 .241 .338 .379
a-Fraley - RF 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 .245 .333 .394
7 Senzel - LF 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 .267 .345 .400
8 Barrero - CF 4 0 0 0 0 2 3 .224 .305 .336
9 Casali - C 3 1 1 0 0 2 0 .164 .258 .182
Totals 32 2 7 2 3 11 13
Reds
a-Grounded out for Fairchild in the 6th.
BATTING: 2B: Casali (1, Sale); Newman 2 (7, Sale, Martin); Steer (15, Sale); Stephenson, T (11, Sale). TB: Casali 2; McLain; Newman 5; Steer 2; Stephenson, T 2. RBI: McLain (9); Newman (18). Runners left in scoring position, 2 out: Barrero 2; India. GIDP: India. Team RISP: 3-for-8. Team LOB: 6.
Red Sox Batters AB R H RBI BB K LOB AVG OBP SLG
1 Verdugo - RF 4 1 0 0 1 1 1 .288 .365 .447
2 Devers - 3B 3 1 2 1 1 1 0 .252 .296 .510
3 Turner, J - DH 4 0 2 1 0 2 1 .267 .353 .406
1-Tapia, R - DH 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 .274 .337 .381
4 Yoshida - LF 3 1 0 0 1 0 4 .312 .389 .500
5 Duran, Ja - CF 2 1 0 0 2 1 2 .288 .344 .460
6 Hernández, K - SS 4 2 2 3 0 1 3 .239 .312 .372
7 Casas - 1B 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 .188 .301 .349
8 Wong - C 4 1 1 2 0 1 0 .244 .291 .487
9 Valdez, E - 2B 4 0 1 0 0 1 0 .250 .300 .440
Totals 32 8 8 7 5 8 15
Red Sox
1-Ran for Turner, J in the 8th.
BATTING: 2B: Devers 2 (15, Greene, H, Herget). HR: Hernández, K (5, 7th inning off Gibaut, 0 on, 0 out); Wong (6, 8th inning off Herget, 1 on, 2 out). TB: Devers 4; Hernández, K 5; Turner, J 2; Valdez, E; Wong 4. RBI: Devers (48); Hernández, K 3 (23); Turner, J (22); Wong 2 (15). 2-out RBI: Wong 2. Runners left in scoring position, 2 out: Casas. Team RISP: 4-for-7. Team LOB: 5.
FIELDING: Outfield assists: Verdugo (Steer at home). DP: 2 (Verdugo-Wong; Devers-Valdez, E-Casas).
Reds Pitchers IP H R ER BB K HR P-S ERA
Greene, H 6.0 2 1 1 3 8 0 109-67 3.92
Gibaut 1.0 1 1 1 0 0 1 8-7 3.76
Herget (L, 1-2) 1.0 5 6 6 2 0 1 29-19 5.30
Totals 8.0 8 8 8 5 8 2
Red Sox Pitchers IP H R ER BB K HR P-S ERA
Sale 3.2 5 1 1 1 6 0 59-40 4.58
Garza 1.1 0 0 0 0 1 0 19-12 1.17
Winckowski 1.0 0 0 0 1 1 0 16-9 2.08
Pivetta 1.0 0 0 0 0 3 0 15-10 5.54
Martin (W, 1-1)(BS, 1) 1.0 2 1 1 0 0 0 17-13 1.72
Jansen 1.0 0 0 0 1 0 0 13-6 3.24
Totals 9.0 7 2 2 3 11 0
Game Info
WP: Martin.
Balk: Herget.
IBB: Duran, Ja (by Herget).
Pitches-strikes: Greene, H 109-67; Gibaut 8-7; Herget 29-19; Sale 59-40; Garza 19-12; Winckowski 16-9; Pivetta 15-10; Martin 17-13; Jansen 13-6.
Groundouts-flyouts: Greene, H 1-8; Gibaut 1-1; Herget 3-0; Sale 1-2; Garza 1-0; Winckowski 1-1; Pivetta 0-0; Martin 1-1; Jansen 1-1.
Batters faced: Greene, H 23; Gibaut 4; Herget 10; Sale 16; Garza 4; Winckowski 4; Pivetta 3; Martin 4; Jansen 4.
Inherited runners-scored: Garza 2-0.
Umpires: HP: Jim Wolf. 1B: Mike Muchlinski. 2B: Sean Barber. 3B: Alan Porter.
Weather: 85 degrees, Clear.
Wind: 4 mph, Out To LF.
First pitch: 7:12 PM.
T: 2:38.
Att: 31,204.
Venue: Fenway Park.
June 1, 2023
Inning Scoring Play Score
Top 3 Kevin Newman doubles (6) on a fly ball to center fielder Jarren Duran. Curt Casali scores. 1-0 CIN
Bottom 4 Justin Turner singles on a ground ball to right fielder Stuart Fairchild, deflected by first baseman Spencer Steer. Rafael Devers scores. 1-1
Bottom 7 Enrique Hernandez homers (5) on a line drive to left center field. 2-1 BOS
Top 8 Matt McLain singles on a ground ball to center fielder Jarren Duran. Kevin Newman scores. 2-2
Bottom 8 Rafael Devers doubles (15) on a sharp fly ball to center fielder Jose Barrero. Alex Verdugo scores. 3-2 BOS
Bottom 8 Enrique Hernandez singles on a ground ball to right fielder Jake Fraley. Masataka Yoshida scores. Jarren Duran scores. 6-2 BOS
Bottom 8 Connor Wong homers (6) on a line drive to left center field. Enrique Hernandez scores. 8-2 BOS
Team Highlight
BOS Bullpen availability for Boston, June 1 vs Reds (00:00:07)
CIN Bullpen availability for Cincinnati, June 1 vs Red Sox (00:00:07)
CIN Fielding alignment for Cincinnati, June 1 vs Red Sox (00:00:11)
BOS Fielding alignment for Boston, June 1 vs Reds (00:00:11)
BOS Starting lineups for Reds at Red Sox - June 1, 2023 (00:00:09)
BOS Connor Wong's home run through bat tracking data (00:00:09)
CIN Kevin Newman's RBI double (00:00:17)
BOS Alex Verdugo nabs Steer at home (00:01:29)
BOS Justin Turner's RBI single (00:00:21)
BOS Rafael Devers' unusual double (00:00:40)
BOS Chris Sale strikes out six (00:01:03)
BOS Chris Sale exits with an injury (00:01:16)
BOS Kiké Hernández's go-ahead HR (5) (00:00:31)
CIN Matt McLain's game-tying single (00:00:16)
BOS Rafael Devers' go-ahead double (00:00:27)
BOS Kiké Hernández's two-run single (00:00:32)
BOS Raimel Tapia scores on a balk (00:00:26)
BOS Connor Wong's two-run homer (6) (00:00:45)
BOS Fan catches Alex Verdugo's bat (00:00:16)
BOS Kenley Jansen secures the win (00:00:59)
BOS The Red Sox score six in the 8th (00:02:11)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 R H E LOB
Reds 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 7 0 6
Red Sox 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 6 8 8 0 5

Decisions

Division Scoreboard

MIL 1 @ TOR 3 - Final
Last Updated: 06/01/2023 10:28:47 PM EDT
submitted by RedsModerator to Reds [link] [comments]

2023.06.01 22:30 Deeb4905 Streak 46: Mug cake

Jag brukar inte laga mat mycket, inte "riktiga" recepter åtminstone. Det kräver tid, tålamod och utrustning. Men det är fortfarande nåt att jag gilla göra, så jag bakar en tårta från tid till annan till exempel. Så jag tänkte på vilken recept jag skulle kunna skriva om här, de flesta av recepter jag använder så behåller jag faktiskt inte (jag har håll på titta på min skärm i 10 minuter undrande vad skulle vara ordordningen i den här meningen, jag kommer inte att hitta nåt bättre 😥). Nog inte så duktigt, varje gång måste jag hitta en ny recept. Men samtidigt finns det så många recepter på internet, det är aldrig för svårt att hitta nåt gott.
Bland alla denna recepter jag hittar och tappar, finns en som jag använder mycket. Det är en mug cake recept, en kaka som bakas i en mugg med en mikrovågsugn. Jättepraktikt för mig, eftersom jar har ingen ugn hemma. Jag provade flera mug cake recepter förut, men den här är den bästa jag har provat. De andra var aldrig perfekt bakade, även om det förstås beror om din mikrovågsugn. Den här är dessutom jätte lätt att laga, och vegansk.
Recept: lägg 2 matskedar mjöl, 2 matskedar kakaopulver, 2 matskedar socker och en fjärdedel av tesked bakpulver i en mugg, sen blända (alltid blanda de torka ingredienserna tillsammans innan lägga till de vätska ingredienserna). Lägg till 1 matsked ölja och 3 matsked växtbaserad mjölk (min favorit är hasselnot). Du kan också tillägga choklad bitar för att de smältar. Om du provar blandningen nu ska du se att den är jättesöt, men oroa dig inte, efter tillagning det skulle bli bättre. Sätt i mikrovågsugnen i ungefär 45 sekunder-1 minut, och det är klart!
submitted by Deeb4905 to WriteStreakSV [link] [comments]

2023.06.01 22:14 unit00ayanami [partially lost] Kabillion World MMO

i’m not sure if the actual name but from what i can tell it’s kabillion world
Kabillion is a streaming service of sorts which was on comcast/ on demand service which aired shows like Transformers The animated series, Code Lyoko, and bobby’s world, basically a version of boomerang if that makes sense.
so I’m not sure if this will count as lost media, but I can’t find anything on it. When I was seven I used to play a game on kabillion.com it was an MMO kind of like the club from nickelodeon. I remember grinding in the game a lot a few years ago I tried to revisit it, but it’s no longer up on the Kabillion website the Internet archive doesn’t seem to have a very good loading of the page, nor do I think I can access it. I the last time I think I played it was 2011-ish I remember you used to be able to get like costume and stuff typical MMO things I believe the items you can receive were related to the shows Kabillion was airing at the time, so that would be like Code Lyoko, or Spider-Man, the new animated series I vaguely remember having a Spider-Man costume for my character, but I could probably be remembering it wrong.
there’s a bit of content if you dig but as for the game itself i don’t believe it’s playable nor do i have a clue where anything like that could be
Here’s some gameplay off youtube
submitted by unit00ayanami to lostmedia [link] [comments]

2023.06.01 21:44 NewYorkMetsBot2 POST GAME THREAD: The Mets defeated the Phillies by a score of 4-2 - Thu, Jun 01 @ 01:10 PM EDT

Phillies @ Mets - Thu, Jun 01

Game Status: Game Over - Score: 4-2 Mets

Links & Info

Phillies Batters AB R H RBI BB K LOB AVG OBP SLG
1 Stott - 2B 4 0 0 0 0 2 1 .284 .320 .396
2 Turner - SS 4 1 1 0 0 2 0 .236 .279 .369
3 Harper - DH 3 1 0 0 1 1 0 .304 .404 .467
4 Castellanos, N - RF 3 0 3 1 0 0 0 .300 .345 .461
5 Schwarber - LF 4 0 0 0 0 2 3 .160 .312 .387
6 Marsh - CF 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 .275 .373 .475
b-Ellis - PH 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 .000 .000 .000
7 Clemens - 1B 3 0 0 0 0 1 2 .257 .321 .459
8 Sosa, E - 3B 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 .254 .276 .410
9 Stubbs - C 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 .242 .286 .333
a-Realmuto - C 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .256 .306 .420
Totals 31 2 6 1 1 12 7
Phillies
a-Grounded out for Stubbs in the 8th. b-Flied out for Marsh in the 9th.
BATTING: TB: Castellanos, N 3; Marsh; Stubbs; Turner. RBI: Castellanos, N (29). Runners left in scoring position, 2 out: Clemens. SF: Castellanos, N. GIDP: Stott. Team RISP: 0-for-1. Team LOB: 4.
Mets Batters AB R H RBI BB K LOB AVG OBP SLG
1 Nimmo - CF 3 1 1 0 1 0 0 .295 .381 .433
2 Lindor - SS 3 0 0 0 1 0 1 .220 .293 .422
3 McNeil - 2B 4 0 1 1 0 0 1 .287 .362 .356
4 Alonso - 1B 3 0 0 0 1 2 3 .235 .332 .545
5 Baty - 3B 4 1 1 0 0 0 1 .240 .311 .388
6 Marte, S - RF 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 .243 .312 .309
7 Vogelbach - DH 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 .215 .359 .308
a-Vientos - DH 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 .192 .214 .308
8 Canha - LF 2 1 1 2 1 0 0 .245 .330 .406
9 Alvarez - C 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 .252 .308 .523
Totals 26 4 4 4 4 3 10
Mets
a-Hit a sacrifice fly for Vogelbach in the 6th.
BATTING: 2B: Baty (6, Strahm). HR: Canha (5, 4th inning off Walker, T, 1 on, 2 out). TB: Baty 2; Canha 4; McNeil; Nimmo. RBI: Canha 2 (18); McNeil (17); Vientos (4). 2-out RBI: Canha 2; McNeil. Runners left in scoring position, 2 out: Alonso; Vogelbach. SAC: Marte, S. SF: Vientos. Team RISP: 2-for-5. Team LOB: 5.
FIELDING: E: Alvarez (3, throw). DP: (Alonso-Lindor-Alonso).
Phillies Pitchers IP H R ER BB K HR P-S ERA
Walker, T (L, 4-3) 4.0 2 3 3 3 2 1 74-38 5.65
Strahm 2.0 2 1 1 1 1 0 41-25 3.20
Soto, G 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15-11 5.48
Kimbrel 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12-8 5.57
Totals 8.0 4 4 4 4 3 1
Mets Pitchers IP H R ER BB K HR P-S ERA
Scherzer (W, 5-2) 7.0 5 2 1 1 9 0 101-71 3.21
Brigham (H, 4) 1.0 0 0 0 0 1 0 15-11 3.26
Raley, B (H, 13) 0.2 1 0 0 0 2 0 16-10 2.84
Smith, Dr (S, 2) 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1-1 3.86
Totals 9.0 6 2 1 1 12 0
Game Info
HBP: Marte, S (by Walker, T).
Pitches-strikes: Walker, T 74-38; Strahm 41-25; Soto, G 15-11; Kimbrel 12-8; Scherzer 101-71; Brigham 15-11; Raley, B 16-10; Smith, Dr 1-1.
Groundouts-flyouts: Walker, T 6-1; Strahm 3-1; Soto, G 1-1; Kimbrel 2-1; Scherzer 5-3; Brigham 1-0; Raley, B 0-0; Smith, Dr 0-1.
Batters faced: Walker, T 18; Strahm 9; Soto, G 3; Kimbrel 3; Scherzer 26; Brigham 3; Raley, B 3; Smith, Dr 1.
Inherited runners-scored: Smith, Dr 1-0.
Umpires: HP: Tripp Gibson. 1B: Edwin Jimenez. 2B: Edwin Moscoso. 3B: Chris Guccione.
Weather: 82 degrees, Sunny.
Wind: 4 mph, Out To LF.
First pitch: 1:10 PM.
T: 2:32.
Att: 38,302.
Venue: Citi Field.
June 1, 2023
Inning Scoring Play Score
Top 1 Nick Castellanos out on a sacrifice fly to center fielder Brandon Nimmo. Bryce Harper scores. 2-0 PHI
Bottom 3 Jeff McNeil singles on a line drive to center fielder Brandon Marsh. Brandon Nimmo scores. Francisco Lindor to 3rd. 2-1 PHI
Bottom 4 Mark Canha homers (5) on a fly ball to left center field. Starling Marte scores. 3-2 NYM
Bottom 6 Mark Vientos out on a sacrifice fly to center fielder Brandon Marsh. Brett Baty scores. 4-2 NYM
Team Highlight
NYM Bullpen availability for New York, June 1 vs Phillies (00:00:07)
PHI Bullpen availability for Philadelphia, June 1 vs Mets (00:00:07)
PHI Fielding alignment for Philadelphia, June 1 vs Mets (00:00:11)
NYM Max Scherzer's outing against the Phillies (00:00:25)
PHI Phillies score on an error (00:00:24)
PHI Nick Castellanos' sac fly (00:00:20)
NYM Jeff McNeil's RBI single (00:00:16)
NYM Mark Canha's two-run homer (5) (00:00:29)
PHI Taijuan Walker strikes out Alonso (00:00:16)
PHI Nimmo is out after review (00:00:26)
NYM Mark Vientos' sac fly (00:00:14)
NYM Max Scherzer's strong outing (00:01:13)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 R H E LOB
Phillies 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 0 4
Mets 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 4 4 1 5

Decisions

Division Scoreboard

SD 10 @ MIA 1 - Game Over
Next Mets Game: Fri, Jun 02, 07:10 PM EDT vs. Blue Jays (1 day)
Posted: 06/01/2023 03:44:10 PM EDT
submitted by NewYorkMetsBot2 to NewYorkMets [link] [comments]

2023.06.01 21:43 satyajeetRaddy ATT Internet Discount Questions

Hello Folks,
This is my first time here so forgive me If I make any mistakes. I wanted to ask AT&T Internet Discount works because I am confused. I understand I get $200 for buying new phone and porting the number. I also understand I get $250 for BYOD and porting in my number. However I am confused does that ATT internet deal apply to each line? I know BOYD program by itself is capped to 2 lines.
For Context, I am transferring 3 lines form t-mobile. I am planning to buy 1 phone and 2 as BOYD. So am I able to redeem $250 for 2 lines and another $200 for the line I am buying phone with?
Thank you.
submitted by satyajeetRaddy to ATT [link] [comments]

2023.06.01 21:43 PhilsBot The Phillies fell to the Mets by a score of 4-2 - Thu, Jun 01 @ 01:10 PM EDT

Phillies @ Mets - Thu, Jun 01

Game Status: Final - Score: 4-2 Mets

Links & Info

Phillies Batters AB R H RBI BB K LOB AVG OBP SLG
1 Stott - 2B 4 0 0 0 0 2 1 .284 .320 .396
2 Turner - SS 4 1 1 0 0 2 0 .236 .279 .369
3 Harper - DH 3 1 0 0 1 1 0 .304 .404 .467
4 Castellanos, N - RF 3 0 3 1 0 0 0 .300 .345 .461
5 Schwarber - LF 4 0 0 0 0 2 3 .160 .312 .387
6 Marsh - CF 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 .275 .373 .475
b-Ellis - PH 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 .000 .000 .000
7 Clemens - 1B 3 0 0 0 0 1 2 .257 .321 .459
8 Sosa, E - 3B 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 .254 .276 .410
9 Stubbs - C 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 .242 .286 .333
a-Realmuto - C 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .256 .306 .420
Totals 31 2 6 1 1 12 7
Phillies
a-Grounded out for Stubbs in the 8th. b-Flied out for Marsh in the 9th.
BATTING: TB: Castellanos, N 3; Marsh; Stubbs; Turner. RBI: Castellanos, N (29). Runners left in scoring position, 2 out: Clemens. SF: Castellanos, N. GIDP: Stott. Team RISP: 0-for-1. Team LOB: 4.
Mets Batters AB R H RBI BB K LOB AVG OBP SLG
1 Nimmo - CF 3 1 1 0 1 0 0 .295 .381 .433
2 Lindor - SS 3 0 0 0 1 0 1 .220 .293 .422
3 McNeil - 2B 4 0 1 1 0 0 1 .287 .362 .356
4 Alonso - 1B 3 0 0 0 1 2 3 .235 .332 .545
5 Baty - 3B 4 1 1 0 0 0 1 .240 .311 .388
6 Marte, S - RF 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 .243 .312 .309
7 Vogelbach - DH 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 .215 .359 .308
a-Vientos - DH 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 .192 .214 .308
8 Canha - LF 2 1 1 2 1 0 0 .245 .330 .406
9 Alvarez - C 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 .252 .308 .523
Totals 26 4 4 4 4 3 10
Mets
a-Hit a sacrifice fly for Vogelbach in the 6th.
BATTING: 2B: Baty (6, Strahm). HR: Canha (5, 4th inning off Walker, T, 1 on, 2 out). TB: Baty 2; Canha 4; McNeil; Nimmo. RBI: Canha 2 (18); McNeil (17); Vientos (4). 2-out RBI: Canha 2; McNeil. Runners left in scoring position, 2 out: Alonso; Vogelbach. SAC: Marte, S. SF: Vientos. Team RISP: 2-for-5. Team LOB: 5.
FIELDING: E: Alvarez (3, throw). DP: (Alonso-Lindor-Alonso).
Phillies Pitchers IP H R ER BB K HR P-S ERA
Walker, T (L, 4-3) 4.0 2 3 3 3 2 1 74-38 5.65
Strahm 2.0 2 1 1 1 1 0 41-25 3.20
Soto, G 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15-11 5.48
Kimbrel 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12-8 5.57
Totals 8.0 4 4 4 4 3 1
Mets Pitchers IP H R ER BB K HR P-S ERA
Scherzer (W, 5-2) 7.0 5 2 1 1 9 0 101-71 3.21
Brigham (H, 4) 1.0 0 0 0 0 1 0 15-11 3.26
Raley, B (H, 13) 0.2 1 0 0 0 2 0 16-10 2.84
Smith, Dr (S, 2) 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1-1 3.86
Totals 9.0 6 2 1 1 12 0
Game Info
HBP: Marte, S (by Walker, T).
Pitches-strikes: Walker, T 74-38; Strahm 41-25; Soto, G 15-11; Kimbrel 12-8; Scherzer 101-71; Brigham 15-11; Raley, B 16-10; Smith, Dr 1-1.
Groundouts-flyouts: Walker, T 6-1; Strahm 3-1; Soto, G 1-1; Kimbrel 2-1; Scherzer 5-3; Brigham 1-0; Raley, B 0-0; Smith, Dr 0-1.
Batters faced: Walker, T 18; Strahm 9; Soto, G 3; Kimbrel 3; Scherzer 26; Brigham 3; Raley, B 3; Smith, Dr 1.
Inherited runners-scored: Smith, Dr 1-0.
Umpires: HP: Tripp Gibson. 1B: Edwin Jimenez. 2B: Edwin Moscoso. 3B: Chris Guccione.
Weather: 82 degrees, Sunny.
Wind: 4 mph, Out To LF.
First pitch: 1:10 PM.
T: 2:32.
Att: 38,302.
Venue: Citi Field.
June 1, 2023
Inning Scoring Play Score
Top 1 Nick Castellanos out on a sacrifice fly to center fielder Brandon Nimmo. Bryce Harper scores. 2-0 PHI
Bottom 3 Jeff McNeil singles on a line drive to center fielder Brandon Marsh. Brandon Nimmo scores. Francisco Lindor to 3rd. 2-1 PHI
Bottom 4 Mark Canha homers (5) on a fly ball to left center field. Starling Marte scores. 3-2 NYM
Bottom 6 Mark Vientos out on a sacrifice fly to center fielder Brandon Marsh. Brett Baty scores. 4-2 NYM
Team Highlight
NYM Bullpen availability for New York, June 1 vs Phillies (00:00:07)
PHI Bullpen availability for Philadelphia, June 1 vs Mets (00:00:07)
PHI Fielding alignment for Philadelphia, June 1 vs Mets (00:00:11)
PHI Breaking down Taijuan Walker's pitches (00:00:08)
PHI Phillies score on an error (00:00:24)
PHI Nick Castellanos' sac fly (00:00:20)
NYM Jeff McNeil's RBI single (00:00:16)
NYM Mark Canha's two-run homer (5) (00:00:29)
PHI Taijuan Walker strikes out Alonso (00:00:16)
PHI Nimmo is out after review (00:00:26)
NYM Mark Vientos' sac fly (00:00:14)
NYM Max Scherzer's strong outing (00:01:13)
NYM Drew Smith gets the final out (00:00:13)
NYM Max Scherzer on his performance (00:01:56)
PHI Condensed Game: [email protected] 6/1/23 (00:09:08)
NYM Buck Showalter on win, Scherzer (00:01:52)
PHI Phillies vs. Mets Highlights (00:03:50)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 R H E LOB
Phillies 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 0 4
Mets 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 4 4 1 5

Decisions

Division Scoreboard

SD 10 @ MIA 1 - Final
Next Phillies Game: Fri, Jun 02, 07:05 PM EDT @ Nationals
Last Updated: 06/01/2023 07:05:20 PM EDT
submitted by PhilsBot to phillies [link] [comments]