How did vader not sense leia

Get the course here: https://www.genkicourses.com/product/dan-koe-digital-economics-masters-degree/ Dan Koe – Digital Economics Masters Degree
https://preview.redd.it/e5bm5i19z5pa1.jpg?width=1920&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b38f3d722558909f9bfa22127af1347efd52b4ef
What You Get Phase 0) Digital Economics 101 The Digital Economics 101 module will open 1 week prior to the cohort start date.This is an onboarding module that will get you up to speed so we can get straight into the material.This will be required to finish before the start date.

• Gain a deep understanding of all of the pieces in the digital economy.
• Learn about the future of media and code — the front-end and backend of the internet — so you can focus your efforts.
• Understand digital leverage, distribution, no-code tools, and digital assets so you can take part in the mental & financial wealth transfer.

Phase 1) Creating A Meaningful Niche Every day I hear people going on and on about trying to find their niche.I also hear people talking about how they don’t know how to combine what they love talking about with *what will sell.*You already have the answer. You just don’t have the clarity.

• Develop a long-term strategy to create your own niche — meaning you don’t have to worry about your “competition” playing status games.
• Discover your life’s work, curiosities, and obsessions. I see too many people that are uncertain about this for years.
• Cultivate and turn your vision, goals, and values into a brand that attracts an audience you love interacting with (and that will buy from you, and only you).

Phase 2) Content Strategy There is one thing that separates those who make it in the digital economy and those who don’t.It’s the quality, articulation, and perceived originality of their content.The content you post has to make sense to the people you attract.Everyone has a different voice and tone that they resonate with. **That they are congruent with and trust.**It has to change their thought patterns or behavior — that’s what makes you memorable.That’s what separates you from the sea of people posting surface-level copy-cat style posts.Example and putting my money where my mouth is:

• Become an expert-level speaker or writer on the topics you care about.
• Never run out of content ideas for your posts or promotions (without using content templates — that’s how you stay a commodity).
• Create posts, blogs, tweets, images, and videos that resonate with other’s on a deep level. People will actually ask you how you got so good at what you do.
• Separate yourself from the ocean of B-tier creators that struggle to sell their products, services, andhave their ideas stick in the head of their audience.
• Implement our Epistemic Research Method — which is just a fancy way of saying scientific research method… but it’s for researching your mind to craft brilliant content and product ideas.

Phase 3) Crafting Your Offer Most people are sitting on a goldmine of skills, experience, and knowledge (that they can use to help people 1-2 steps behind them).That is what people pay for.Considering 95% of the market are beginners… if you are good at something, you can help them get to your level (no matter how “basic” you think the information is).Do you not watch basic content all day anyway? People don’t want new information, they want to be reminded of what works.

• Use our Minimum Viable Offer strategy to start monetizing immediately (and have something to improve over time, rather than procrastinating until it’s perfect).
• Have a strategy for reducing the time you spend working over time (as you build leverage and improve your offer).
• Know how to create your own customers from the audience you are building, instead of “finding” the right customer for your offer.
• Take the guesswork out of building coaching, consulting, or digital product offers.

Phase 4) Marketing Strategy You aren’t making money because you aren’t promoting yourself or your offer.That is literally the only way to make money. Have something desirable and consistently put it in front of peoples’ faces.In Phase 4, I will show you how to systemize, automate, and be consistent with simple will be able to make money without having the chance of forgetting to do it (or letting fear of failure get in the way).

• Learn to sell on social media, in your writing, and across different platforms.
• Have consistent sales coming in while focusing on your meaningful message (no need to sound salesy all the time).
• Learn advanced automation strategies that you can implement at your own pace, especially once you validate your offer.

Bonus) The Creator Command Center The Creator Command Center is a Notion template that houses all of the systems.This is how you will manage your brand, content, offer creation, marketing strategy, and systemized promotions for consistent sales. Bonus) Live Product Build & Launch In the first Digital Economics Cohort, I built out my course The 2 Hour Writer.I have videos showing how I build it with the strategies in phase 3 and 4.There is a bonus module that shows how I had an $85,000 launch that resulted in my first $100K month.I did this to prove the strategies inside Digital Economics work if you stick to the plan.***And, this past Black Friday, I blew my that monthly high out of the water in 4 days.***That’s the power of these strategies if you stay consistent with your life’s work.

Hi, is this the correct settings for "make menuconfig"? Can pls someone point me in the direction of a guide on how to setup klipper on the sv 06? At this stagae its running on my orange pi, but does not connect to a printer. Did i make correct firmware?

Hi. First time posting, I was messing around with ChatGPT regarding unexplained mysteries, and fell into the Dyatlov Pass rabbit hole. I found this intriguing, what do you all think?
Thanks!
The output:
https://preview.redd.it/sz8tog26vfpa1.png?width=612&format=png&auto=webp&s=92a62197e44ac86ecb712756fe1ee56d7cd231cb
​
​
​
In this text is the prompt I used.
Tell me about the Dylatlov pass incident in thorough detail.
The Dyatlov Pass incident is a mysterious and perplexing event that took place in the Ural Mountains of the Soviet Union (now Russia) in 1959. The tragedy involved the deaths of nine experienced ski hikers, and to this day, it remains an unsolved mystery with various theories attempting to explain the bizarre circumstances surrounding the event.
Here is a detailed account of the incident:

1. The group: The expedition was led by Igor Dyatlov, a 23-year-old radio engineering student at the Ural Polytechnical Institute. The group consisted of eight men and two women, all of whom were experienced hikers and skiers. Their aim was to reach the summit of Otorten, a mountain in the northern Urals.
2. The journey: On January 25, 1959, the group set off from the city of Sverdlovsk (now Yekaterinburg) by train. They reached the town of Ivdel on January 27 and proceeded to the village of Vizhay on January 28. From there, they began their trek towards Otorten on January 31.
3. The events: The group had planned to reach Otorten by February 12, but they encountered bad weather and poor visibility. On February 1, they deviated from their original route and ended up on the eastern slope of Kholat Syakhl, a nearby mountain. They decided to set up camp there for the night.
4. The search: When the group didn't return as scheduled, friends and family became concerned. Initially, a search party consisting of volunteers was organized, but when they found no trace of the hikers, the Soviet military joined the search efforts on February 20.
5. The discovery: On February 26, the search party discovered the group's abandoned and badly damaged tent on Kholat Syakhl. The tent was cut open from the inside, and most of the hikers' belongings and equipment were left behind. Footprints from the tent led to a nearby wooded area, about 1.5 km away.
6. The bodies: The first two bodies, those of Yuri Doroshenko and Yuri Krivonischenko, were found near the remains of a makeshift fire under a cedar tree at the edge of the forest. Both were shoeless and dressed only in underwear. Three more bodies, those of Igor Dyatlov, Zinaida Kolmogorova, and Rustem Slobodin, were discovered between the tent and the cedar tree, apparently attempting to return to the tent. These bodies were found at different intervals, suggesting they died at different times.
7. The remaining victims: The last four bodies were not discovered until May 4, buried under several meters of snow in a ravine 75 meters from the cedar tree. These hikers were better dressed than the others, and some of their clothing appeared to have been taken from the bodies found earlier.
8. The autopsies: The initial autopsies revealed that six of the hikers died of hypothermia, while the other three suffered from fatal injuries. Nikolai Thibeaux-Brignollel had a fractured skull, and Lyudmila Dubinina and Semyon Zolotaryov had severe chest fractures. The force required to cause such injuries was found to be immense, akin to a car crash. Additionally, Dubinina's tongue and part of her facial tissue were missing.
9. The investigation: The Soviet authorities conducted an investigation into the incident but were unable to determine the cause of the hikers' deaths. The case was closed in May 1959, and the official conclusion was that an "unknown compelling force" led to their demise.

The Dy
📷📷Pick up where you left off: "The investigation: The Soviet authorities conducted an investigation into the incident but were unable to determine the cause of the hikers' deaths. The case was closed in May 1959, and the official conclusion was that an "unknown compelling force" led to their demise. The Dy "
The Dyatlov Pass incident has been the subject of intense speculation and numerous theories over the years, as the circumstances surrounding the event remain mysterious and unexplained. Some of the popular theories include:

1. Avalanche: One of the most widely accepted theories is that an avalanche forced the hikers to flee their tent in a hurry. The pressure and force of the avalanche could have caused the fatal injuries found on some of the victims. However, critics argue that the lack of significant damage to the tent and the absence of typical avalanche debris contradict this theory.
2. Infrasound: Another theory suggests that a weather phenomenon called the "Kármán vortex street" could have produced infrasound, causing the hikers to experience panic attacks and disorientation. The vortex occurs when wind flows around a blunt object, such as a mountain, and creates low-frequency sound waves that can induce feelings of fear or discomfort in humans. This theory, however, fails to explain the severe injuries some of the hikers sustained.
3. Military involvement: Some theories propose that the hikers accidentally entered a secret military testing zone and were killed as a result. This could explain the unusual injuries, the presence of radioactive material on some of the clothing, and the subsequent secrecy surrounding the investigation. However, there is no concrete evidence to support these claims.
4. Indigenous Mansi people: Another theory suggests that the hikers may have unknowingly trespassed on sacred land belonging to the indigenous Mansi people, who then attacked the group. However, the lack of any signs of a struggle and the fact that the Mansi had peaceful interactions with hikers in the past make this theory less plausible.
5. Paranormal explanations: Some theories involve more outlandish explanations, such as UFOs or yeti attacks. These theories often cite the strange injuries, missing body parts, and reports of strange lights in the sky around the time of the incident as evidence. However, these explanations lack any solid evidence and are generally not taken seriously by experts.

Despite the numerous theories, the Dyatlov Pass incident remains an unsolved mystery. The Russian government reopened the investigation into the case in 2019, but their conclusion in 2020 pointed towards an avalanche as the most likely cause of the tragedy, albeit not satisfying all skeptics. The Dyatlov Pass incident continues to captivate researchers and enthusiasts, fueling speculation and debate about what truly happened to the nine hikers in 1959.
📷📷So if we're talking about theories on the Dyatlov Pass incident, what would you observe based on the known data, accounts, witnesses, family history, or any other potential factors in the disappearance? If you would postulate new theory, or lead credence to an existing theory, what would that theory be?
As an AI language model, I cannot observe or form opinions like a human can. However, I can provide an analysis of the existing theories and evidence related to the Dyatlov Pass incident. Based on the known data, accounts, and various factors, the following points can be considered:

1. The hikers were experienced and well-prepared for the journey, making it unlikely that they made a significant error in judgment or preparation that led to the tragedy.
2. The damage to the tent suggests that the hikers were forced to leave in a hurry, possibly due to a sudden threat. The fact that they cut the tent from the inside indicates the urgency of the situation.
3. The state of undress and lack of footwear in some of the victims suggest that they left the tent in a state of panic or disorientation.
4. The severe injuries found on some of the hikers, including crushed ribs and fractured skulls, point towards a powerful force, which is not easily explained by human attackers or animal predation.
5. The presence of radioactive material on some of the hikers' clothing has never been conclusively explained, adding to the mystery surrounding the case.

Considering these factors, it is challenging to single out one theory as the definitive explanation for the Dyatlov Pass incident. The avalanche theory, despite its shortcomings, seems to be the most plausible explanation in terms of natural phenomena. The force of an avalanche could potentially explain the severe injuries, and the panic caused by an approaching avalanche could explain the hurried exit from the tent.
However, the lack of clear evidence for an avalanche and the presence of certain unexplained elements, such as radioactivity and the missing body parts, leave room for alternative theories. Military involvement or secret testing could potentially explain some of the unusual aspects of the case, but concrete evidence supporting these theories is lacking.
In conclusion, while the avalanche theory appears to be the most plausible given the available evidence, the Dyatlov Pass incident remains an enigmatic and perplexing mystery that has yet to be definitively solved.
📷📷Let's make a fictional scenario: You are an investigator looking at this incident, and are trying to solve aspects of the incident, what would you look at? How would you investigate it? Be creative here, but realistic.
As an investigator assigned to the Dyatlov Pass incident, I would approach the case by re-examining the available evidence and exploring new avenues of investigation that may have been overlooked or not available at the time of the original inquiry. Here is a step-by-step approach to investigating the case:

1. Revisit the scene: I would begin by visiting the Dyatlov Pass and the locations where the bodies were found. Familiarizing myself with the terrain, weather patterns, and natural hazards could provide valuable context when reviewing the evidence.
2. Re-examine the evidence: I would meticulously review all photographs, documents, and reports from the original investigation, looking for any inconsistencies or overlooked details. This would include the autopsy reports, witness statements, and any available records of the hikers' activities before and during the trek.
3. Conduct interviews: I would speak with surviving family members, friends, and anyone else who may have had contact with the hikers before the incident. This might reveal new information or help to corroborate existing evidence.
4. Consult experts: I would consult with experts in various fields, including avalanche and weather specialists, forensic pathologists, and experts on local indigenous populations, to gather their insights and opinions on the available evidence. This might help to identify potential explanations for the unusual aspects of the case, such as the severe injuries and radioactivity.
5. Investigate military records: Given the theory of military involvement or secret testing, I would seek access to military records and archives from the time of the incident, looking for any indication of activities in the area that could be linked to the Dyatlov Pass event.
6. Utilize modern technology: Advances in technology since the original investigation could provide new insights into the case. I would explore the use of satellite imagery, ground-penetrating radar, or other remote sensing technologies to search for any anomalies or signs of past events, such as an avalanche, that may have left traces in the landscape.
7. Reconstruct the timeline: Based on the available evidence and any new information gathered during the investigation, I would create a detailed timeline of events leading up to the incident. This would help to identify any gaps in knowledge or inconsistencies in the evidence.
8. Analyze and test theories: I would critically analyze all existing theories, as well as any new hypotheses that emerged during the investigation. This would involve comparing each theory against the available evidence, conducting experiments or simulations, and identifying any additional information that would be required to confirm or disprove each hypothesis.
9. Report findings: Finally, I would compile my findings into a comprehensive report, presenting the evidence, expert opinions, and any new information uncovered during the investigation. This report would aim to provide a clear and concise overview of the case, along with a well-reasoned conclusion based on the available evidence and analysis.

By combining a thorough review of the existing evidence with modern investigative techniques and expert insights, this creative yet realistic approach would aim to shed new light on the enigmatic Dyatlov Pass incident and potentially bring us closer to understanding what truly happened to the nine hikers in 1959.
📷📷Ok. So as a fictional investigator, create a case and compile existing evidence for which theory is most credible, and if you postulate your own theory, what would it be? Consider all available information that you have been trained on, and see if you find any patterns or novel observations in that info. There might be information that has been overlooked; so you, as a new fictional investigator, are tasked with combing through the evidence.
As a fictional investigator, I have thoroughly reviewed the existing evidence and expert opinions on the Dyatlov Pass incident. Based on my analysis, the most credible theory appears to be a combination of natural phenomena and human factors that led to the tragic outcome. Here is a summary of the evidence and a postulated theory:

1. Avalanche risk: The hikers camped on the slope of Kholat Syakhl, which, while not ideal, might have been their only option given the weather conditions and poor visibility. The slope's angle and snow accumulation made it susceptible to a small-scale avalanche, even if the evidence of an avalanche was not immediately visible to the search party.
2. Snow slab: A "snow slab" release could have occurred near the tent, causing a sudden and violent displacement of snow. This would not leave the same debris pattern as a typical avalanche, but the force of the snow slab could still cause severe injuries, such as the fractured skulls and crushed ribs seen in some of the victims.
3. Panic and disorientation: The sudden release of the snow slab could have caused panic among the hikers, leading them to cut their way out of the tent in a hurry. In the chaos, they might have become disoriented and separated, making it difficult for them to find their way back to the tent.
4. Hypothermia and paradoxical undressing: As the hikers attempted to find shelter, they were exposed to the harsh elements and began to suffer from hypothermia. A symptom of severe hypothermia is "paradoxical undressing," where individuals feel a burning sensation and remove their clothing, which could explain the state of undress in some of the victims.
5. Redistribution of clothing: The better-dressed hikers in the ravine likely took clothing from their deceased companions in an attempt to stay warm, explaining the mix of garments among the victims.
6. Injuries from a fall: The hikers found in the ravine might have suffered their injuries by falling into the ravine, which could explain the severity of their wounds. The missing body parts, such as Dubinina's tongue, could be attributed to scavengers or decomposition.
7. Radioactivity: The presence of radioactive material on some of the clothing might have come from naturally occurring sources, such as thorium or potassium in the rocks and soil, or from contamination prior to the trip, as some of the hikers worked in fields related to nuclear technology.

In summary, my postulated theory is that a combination of natural phenomena (snow slab, hypothermia) and human factors (panic, disorientation) led to the tragic deaths of the hikers. The unusual aspects of the case, such as the severe injuries and radioactivity, can be explained by considering the unique circumstances of the incident and the environment in which it occurred. While this theory might not account for every detail, it provides a plausible and cohesive explanation for the Dyatlov Pass incident based on the available evidence.