1. The group: The expedition was led by Igor Dyatlov, a 23-year-old radio engineering student at the Ural Polytechnical Institute. The group consisted of eight men and two women, all of whom were experienced hikers and skiers. Their aim was to reach the summit of Otorten, a mountain in the northern Urals.
2. The journey: On January 25, 1959, the group set off from the city of Sverdlovsk (now Yekaterinburg) by train. They reached the town of Ivdel on January 27 and proceeded to the village of Vizhay on January 28. From there, they began their trek towards Otorten on January 31.
3. The events: The group had planned to reach Otorten by February 12, but they encountered bad weather and poor visibility. On February 1, they deviated from their original route and ended up on the eastern slope of Kholat Syakhl, a nearby mountain. They decided to set up camp there for the night.
4. The search: When the group didn't return as scheduled, friends and family became concerned. Initially, a search party consisting of volunteers was organized, but when they found no trace of the hikers, the Soviet military joined the search efforts on February 20.
5. The discovery: On February 26, the search party discovered the group's abandoned and badly damaged tent on Kholat Syakhl. The tent was cut open from the inside, and most of the hikers' belongings and equipment were left behind. Footprints from the tent led to a nearby wooded area, about 1.5 km away.
6. The bodies: The first two bodies, those of Yuri Doroshenko and Yuri Krivonischenko, were found near the remains of a makeshift fire under a cedar tree at the edge of the forest. Both were shoeless and dressed only in underwear. Three more bodies, those of Igor Dyatlov, Zinaida Kolmogorova, and Rustem Slobodin, were discovered between the tent and the cedar tree, apparently attempting to return to the tent. These bodies were found at different intervals, suggesting they died at different times.
7. The remaining victims: The last four bodies were not discovered until May 4, buried under several meters of snow in a ravine 75 meters from the cedar tree. These hikers were better dressed than the others, and some of their clothing appeared to have been taken from the bodies found earlier.
8. The autopsies: The initial autopsies revealed that six of the hikers died of hypothermia, while the other three suffered from fatal injuries. Nikolai Thibeaux-Brignollel had a fractured skull, and Lyudmila Dubinina and Semyon Zolotaryov had severe chest fractures. The force required to cause such injuries was found to be immense, akin to a car crash. Additionally, Dubinina's tongue and part of her facial tissue were missing.
9. The investigation: The Soviet authorities conducted an investigation into the incident but were unable to determine the cause of the hikers' deaths. The case was closed in May 1959, and the official conclusion was that an "unknown compelling force" led to their demise.

1. Avalanche: One of the most widely accepted theories is that an avalanche forced the hikers to flee their tent in a hurry. The pressure and force of the avalanche could have caused the fatal injuries found on some of the victims. However, critics argue that the lack of significant damage to the tent and the absence of typical avalanche debris contradict this theory.
2. Infrasound: Another theory suggests that a weather phenomenon called the "Kármán vortex street" could have produced infrasound, causing the hikers to experience panic attacks and disorientation. The vortex occurs when wind flows around a blunt object, such as a mountain, and creates low-frequency sound waves that can induce feelings of fear or discomfort in humans. This theory, however, fails to explain the severe injuries some of the hikers sustained.
3. Military involvement: Some theories propose that the hikers accidentally entered a secret military testing zone and were killed as a result. This could explain the unusual injuries, the presence of radioactive material on some of the clothing, and the subsequent secrecy surrounding the investigation. However, there is no concrete evidence to support these claims.
4. Indigenous Mansi people: Another theory suggests that the hikers may have unknowingly trespassed on sacred land belonging to the indigenous Mansi people, who then attacked the group. However, the lack of any signs of a struggle and the fact that the Mansi had peaceful interactions with hikers in the past make this theory less plausible.
5. Paranormal explanations: Some theories involve more outlandish explanations, such as UFOs or yeti attacks. These theories often cite the strange injuries, missing body parts, and reports of strange lights in the sky around the time of the incident as evidence. However, these explanations lack any solid evidence and are generally not taken seriously by experts.

1. The hikers were experienced and well-prepared for the journey, making it unlikely that they made a significant error in judgment or preparation that led to the tragedy.
2. The damage to the tent suggests that the hikers were forced to leave in a hurry, possibly due to a sudden threat. The fact that they cut the tent from the inside indicates the urgency of the situation.
3. The state of undress and lack of footwear in some of the victims suggest that they left the tent in a state of panic or disorientation.
4. The severe injuries found on some of the hikers, including crushed ribs and fractured skulls, point towards a powerful force, which is not easily explained by human attackers or animal predation.
5. The presence of radioactive material on some of the hikers' clothing has never been conclusively explained, adding to the mystery surrounding the case.

1. Revisit the scene: I would begin by visiting the Dyatlov Pass and the locations where the bodies were found. Familiarizing myself with the terrain, weather patterns, and natural hazards could provide valuable context when reviewing the evidence.
2. Re-examine the evidence: I would meticulously review all photographs, documents, and reports from the original investigation, looking for any inconsistencies or overlooked details. This would include the autopsy reports, witness statements, and any available records of the hikers' activities before and during the trek.
3. Conduct interviews: I would speak with surviving family members, friends, and anyone else who may have had contact with the hikers before the incident. This might reveal new information or help to corroborate existing evidence.
4. Consult experts: I would consult with experts in various fields, including avalanche and weather specialists, forensic pathologists, and experts on local indigenous populations, to gather their insights and opinions on the available evidence. This might help to identify potential explanations for the unusual aspects of the case, such as the severe injuries and radioactivity.
5. Investigate military records: Given the theory of military involvement or secret testing, I would seek access to military records and archives from the time of the incident, looking for any indication of activities in the area that could be linked to the Dyatlov Pass event.
6. Utilize modern technology: Advances in technology since the original investigation could provide new insights into the case. I would explore the use of satellite imagery, ground-penetrating radar, or other remote sensing technologies to search for any anomalies or signs of past events, such as an avalanche, that may have left traces in the landscape.
7. Reconstruct the timeline: Based on the available evidence and any new information gathered during the investigation, I would create a detailed timeline of events leading up to the incident. This would help to identify any gaps in knowledge or inconsistencies in the evidence.
8. Analyze and test theories: I would critically analyze all existing theories, as well as any new hypotheses that emerged during the investigation. This would involve comparing each theory against the available evidence, conducting experiments or simulations, and identifying any additional information that would be required to confirm or disprove each hypothesis.
9. Report findings: Finally, I would compile my findings into a comprehensive report, presenting the evidence, expert opinions, and any new information uncovered during the investigation. This report would aim to provide a clear and concise overview of the case, along with a well-reasoned conclusion based on the available evidence and analysis.

1. Avalanche risk: The hikers camped on the slope of Kholat Syakhl, which, while not ideal, might have been their only option given the weather conditions and poor visibility. The slope's angle and snow accumulation made it susceptible to a small-scale avalanche, even if the evidence of an avalanche was not immediately visible to the search party.
2. Snow slab: A "snow slab" release could have occurred near the tent, causing a sudden and violent displacement of snow. This would not leave the same debris pattern as a typical avalanche, but the force of the snow slab could still cause severe injuries, such as the fractured skulls and crushed ribs seen in some of the victims.
3. Panic and disorientation: The sudden release of the snow slab could have caused panic among the hikers, leading them to cut their way out of the tent in a hurry. In the chaos, they might have become disoriented and separated, making it difficult for them to find their way back to the tent.
4. Hypothermia and paradoxical undressing: As the hikers attempted to find shelter, they were exposed to the harsh elements and began to suffer from hypothermia. A symptom of severe hypothermia is "paradoxical undressing," where individuals feel a burning sensation and remove their clothing, which could explain the state of undress in some of the victims.
5. Redistribution of clothing: The better-dressed hikers in the ravine likely took clothing from their deceased companions in an attempt to stay warm, explaining the mix of garments among the victims.
6. Injuries from a fall: The hikers found in the ravine might have suffered their injuries by falling into the ravine, which could explain the severity of their wounds. The missing body parts, such as Dubinina's tongue, could be attributed to scavengers or decomposition.
7. Radioactivity: The presence of radioactive material on some of the clothing might have come from naturally occurring sources, such as thorium or potassium in the rocks and soil, or from contamination prior to the trip, as some of the hikers worked in fields related to nuclear technology.

The CFTC commissioner is urging the Congress to unite the regulatory bodies for cryptocurrencies.

Cooperation could lead to better definitions.